The essentiality of the micronutrient boron is well es-tablished, although our knowledge concerning its exact function is still largely empirical. Consideration has been given to the possible existence of a relationship between its biological role in the plant and the capacity of the borate ion to complex with various polyhydroxy and related compounds includingf several of the common sugars (see reviews by Gauch and Dugger (2) and Zittle (14)). Hoagland (3) and Winfield (13) were among the first to call attention to the possibility of such a relationship, and during the past few years experimental work has been directed to determine its nature (1,5,8,10,11). Gauch and co-workers (1,5,8) in particular have studied this problem; they favor the hypothesis that a major function of boron is in sugar translocation by the formation of a sugar-borate complex which passes more readily through membranes. Scripture and MIcHargue (7) have also considered boron as functional in translocation of carbohydrates, but not in light of the formation of a complex. Recently 1\Icllrath and Palser (4, 6) have studied physiological and anatomical plant responses to boron with special reference to carbohydrate relationships.Since various other elements such as strontium, aluminum, and germanium will also form complexes similar to the borate complexes, it was decided to determine whether certain of these elements may substitute partially for boron in the growth of plants. If boron deficiency symptoms are partially alleviated by the addition of any of these other elements in the absence of boron, this would constitute evidence that the essentiality of boron for plant growth is prob-.ably in part related to the complexing property of borate. This report presents in full the results of experiments which were summarized previously (10, 11). questrene Na Fe (monosodium ferri-ethylene-diaminetetraacetate dihydrate); MIn, 0.5 ppm; Zn, 0.5 ppm; Cu, 0.125 ppm; and B, 0.5 ppm or as otherwise stated. Stock solutions were made up in boron-free glassware.All of the other experiments were carried out in a growth room under constant temperature and light conditions. The light was supplied by suspended panels containingf both 72-inch T 8 Standard Cool white fluorescent tubes and 75-watt reflector-type filament lamps delivering approximately 1500 ft-c at the leaf surfaces. A daily photoperiod of 16 hours, a temperature of 750 ± 20 F and a relative humidity of 50 % + 15 % were maintained. The seed were sown in quartz sand and watered with tap water, and the plants were used one week after sowing; at this time the seedlings had expanded cotyledons, but no emerged leaves. They were transferred to nutrient solutions contained in wide-mouthed, low-boron, soft glass, quart fruit jars wrapped in black cloth to exclude light. The plants were supported either by cork pads or by slotted stainless steel holders and held in place by a pliable asbestos type mastic (KalkKord). The slot in the stainless steel holder permitted removal of plants without injury. The solut...