2012
DOI: 10.4172/2324-9315.1000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Bystanders in Mass Casualty Events: Lessons from the 2010 Haiti Earthquake

Abstract: In routine emergencies, official emergency organizations bear the responsibility to manage the event and treat the wounded. The principal role for bystanders is to alert the appropriate emergency organizations. In mass casualty events (MCE), bystanders are the first responders. Research conducted among rescues in the immediate aftermath of the 2010 Haiti earthquake indicates that bystanders can be an effective complement to professional rescue forces and a necessary substitute when professionals lack sufficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are some differences between the experts and the public's views on feasible measures, the sum of all choices defines what an immediate responder should be able to do (Table 8). These findings are in line with earlier reports, of which some claim much more involvement by the public in the medical management of victims of MCIs [1,2,18,[22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, the Swedish public expressed a high willingness to get engaged in the treatment of victims by stabilizing fractures, neck and lower back, implementing a cervical collar, and defending against a perpetrator, which are tasks that were not approved by the expert group or is dangerous for their lives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there are some differences between the experts and the public's views on feasible measures, the sum of all choices defines what an immediate responder should be able to do (Table 8). These findings are in line with earlier reports, of which some claim much more involvement by the public in the medical management of victims of MCIs [1,2,18,[22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, the Swedish public expressed a high willingness to get engaged in the treatment of victims by stabilizing fractures, neck and lower back, implementing a cervical collar, and defending against a perpetrator, which are tasks that were not approved by the expert group or is dangerous for their lives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This waiting period leaves a gap in time, a critical therapeutic window, where victims cannot receive proper care while waiting for the EMS [15,20,21]. Recent MCIs in Paris and Boston enhanced the critical discussion about what could be done at the prehospital level to increase the preparedness for future MCIs [22][23][24][25][26]. Measures such as using Tourniquets to stop hemorrhages were recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation