2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of cellular- and prodrug-associated factors in the bystander effect induced by the Varicella zoster and Herpes simplex viral thymidine kinases in suicide gene therapy

Abstract: To investigate the factors influencing the bystander effect Ð a key element in the efficacy of suicide gene therapy against cancer Ð we compared the effect triggered by four extremely efficient gene / prodrug combinations, i.e., VZVtk / BVDU, the thymidine kinase of Varicella zoster virus associated with ( E ) -5 -( 2 -bromovinyl ) -2 H -deoxyuridine; VZVtk / BVaraU, the same enzyme associated with ( E ) -5 -( 2 -bromovinyl ) -1 --D -arabinofuranosyluracil; HSVtk / BVDU, the association of the Herpes simplex v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by our observation that GCV has a greater effect than BVDU, which correlates with GCV being known to have a greater bystander effect than BVDU. 47,9 It has also been proposed that the host immune system may play a major role in in vivo bystander killing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by our observation that GCV has a greater effect than BVDU, which correlates with GCV being known to have a greater bystander effect than BVDU. 47,9 It has also been proposed that the host immune system may play a major role in in vivo bystander killing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In in vitro settings BVDU is a more efficient and less toxic prodrug than GCV, 7,8 but has a much less potent bystander effect than GCV in HSV-TK-transduced human glioma cells. 9,10 Gene delivery systems that are currently being evaluated by clinical trials include retroviruses, lentiviruses, foamiviruses, adeno and adenoassociated viruses, herpesviruses and cationic liposomes/DNA-protein complexes. So far, TK gene has been delivered by retroviruses and adenoviruses in in vitro [11][12][13][14] and in vivo [15][16][17] applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clones LN18-TK, C6-TK and U87-TK were obtained by transfection with a defective murine retrovirus carrying the HSV-tk and the geneticin resistance genes (gift of Dr C. Grignet), selection in G418, and clonal expansion and selected on the basis of their sensitivity to ganciclovir and of their growth characteristics similar to those of parental LN18, C6 and U87 cells, respectively (20,21). Clone 9L-TK was a gift from Dr C. Grignet (22). All clones were kept in RPMI-C or DEM-C supplemented with G418.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzymes proposed for GDEPT for breast cancer can be divided into two categories. The first category consists of 'foreign' enzymes of nonmammalian origin, such as viral TK, 80,81 bacterial cytosine deaminase (CD), and carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2). 79,82,83 The second category comprises enzymes of human origin, such as cytochrome P450 isophorms.…”
Section: Mutation Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%