2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of chance events in career decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
144
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These events are oftentimes unexpected, meaning either that they cannot be anticipated and proactively acted upon or, even when anticipated, the effects of the event are not anticipated. Such events have been called chance events (Bright, Pryor, & Harpham, 2005), serendipity (Betsworth & Hansen, 1996), happenstance (Miller, 1983) and, most recently, career shocks (Seibert, Kraimer, Holtom, & Pierotti, 2013). Examples of these events include unexpectedly losing one's job or a close relative passing away-as examples of negative shocks -or receiving an unexpected promotion or receiving an award -as examples of positive shocks.…”
Section: The Role Of Career Shocks In Career Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events are oftentimes unexpected, meaning either that they cannot be anticipated and proactively acted upon or, even when anticipated, the effects of the event are not anticipated. Such events have been called chance events (Bright, Pryor, & Harpham, 2005), serendipity (Betsworth & Hansen, 1996), happenstance (Miller, 1983) and, most recently, career shocks (Seibert, Kraimer, Holtom, & Pierotti, 2013). Examples of these events include unexpectedly losing one's job or a close relative passing away-as examples of negative shocks -or receiving an unexpected promotion or receiving an award -as examples of positive shocks.…”
Section: The Role Of Career Shocks In Career Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicholson and West (1989) noted that career paths can be both planless and planned, and the initial planlessness in the accounts here evolved into identification and subsequent pursuit of the desired new occupation. This links to arguments for the salience of happenstance and chance in career (Bright et al, 2004;Miller, 1983).…”
Section: Planless Actions and Positive Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast to the assumption of rational models that people could access salient aspects of self-knowledge on which to base their decision, Krieshok argued that this information is not necessarily available to individuals and decision making can be partially unconscious. Mitchell et al (1999) and Bright et al (2004) argued for the importance of context in career decisions, both sets of scholars focusing on chance events. At a metatheoretical level, McMahon and Patton (1995) proposed a systems framework that acknowledged chance, context and individual attributes as components of a dynamic and open system of career decisions.…”
Section: Other-than-rational Perspectives On Career Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bright, Pryor, and Harpham (2005) argued that given their apparent ubiquity, dismissing chance events as merely error, will continue the tradition of providing accounts of career behavior so far removed from the actual career development experience of individuals and their counselors, that such accounts will remain fundamentally irrelevant to both. (p. 574) Our study lends support to chance events approaches to boundaryless careers, especially those approaches that juxtapose chance encounters, social networks, and protean orientations (e.g., Grimland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Alternative Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%