2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00621.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of climate and plant functional trade-offs in shaping global biome and biodiversity patterns

Abstract: Aim Two of the oldest observations in plant geography are the increase in plant diversity from the poles towards the tropics and the global geographic distribution of vegetation physiognomy (biomes). The objective of this paper is to use a processbased vegetation model to evaluate the relationship between modelled and observed global patterns of plant diversity and the geographic distribution of biomes. LocationThe global terrestrial biosphere. MethodsWe implemented and tested a novel vegetation model aimed at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clark et al (2007) argue that within species variation in plant properties can explain and alleviate this problem, and that the standard approach of using mean species properties to drive CCM's is flawed, because coexistence is greatly facilitated by within species (or plant type) genetic and environmentally modulated heterogeneity. One promising framework is provided by the JeDi model (Reu et al, 2010) that generates a theoretical plant community whose traits vary along twelve functional trade-off gradients. A coupled plant physiology model selects a subset of plant physiological strategies that survive under a given set of climate conditions.…”
Section: Modeling Effects Of Plant Invasions and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clark et al (2007) argue that within species variation in plant properties can explain and alleviate this problem, and that the standard approach of using mean species properties to drive CCM's is flawed, because coexistence is greatly facilitated by within species (or plant type) genetic and environmentally modulated heterogeneity. One promising framework is provided by the JeDi model (Reu et al, 2010) that generates a theoretical plant community whose traits vary along twelve functional trade-off gradients. A coupled plant physiology model selects a subset of plant physiological strategies that survive under a given set of climate conditions.…”
Section: Modeling Effects Of Plant Invasions and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, given the likelihood of future large scale shifts in the distribution, composition and diversity of plant communities driven by climate change (Neilson et al, 2005), we discuss the contrasting approaches taken by major models to simulate species effects on ecosystem C cycling Friedlingstein et al, 2006;Ostle et al, 2009;Reu et al, 2010). In doing so, we highlight potentially important ecological processes currently missing from the model frameworks, evaluate approaches to integrating field data into effective model representations of the processes in question, and suggest priorities for future research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIVE calculates population dynamics as the consequence of different characteristics of PPSs in terms of their biomass, seed flux, growth and mortality rate. These characteristics are derived from the output of the Jena Diversity (JeDi) model (Kleidon and Mooney, 2000;Reu et al, 2011). This model filters many random plant strategies that grow independently from each other to yield those, that can cope with the climate from the fundamental assumption of unavoidable ecophysiological trade-offs.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the JeDi model (Kleidon and Mooney, 2000;Reu et al, 2011) to generate the performances of a whole range of PPSs. JeDi models diverse vegetation from ecophysiological assumptions based on trade-offs.…”
Section: Selection Of Ppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation