2018
DOI: 10.3280/sp2018-002003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of commoning and mutually shaped citizenship in developing bottom-linked governance. The projects living street and future street in Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, European cities represent the stage for many other similar experiences, which are either informally triggered by groups of citizens or activated by funded European or municipal projects (e.g. the Living Street 13 and the Future Street 14 in Belgium (Ganugi 2018) or the Play Street 15 in UK. The study, therefore, may be useful to understand better those cases too or to investigate the enabling conditions for the development of reflexive interfaces in different contexts.…”
Section: Open Conclusion For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, European cities represent the stage for many other similar experiences, which are either informally triggered by groups of citizens or activated by funded European or municipal projects (e.g. the Living Street 13 and the Future Street 14 in Belgium (Ganugi 2018) or the Play Street 15 in UK. The study, therefore, may be useful to understand better those cases too or to investigate the enabling conditions for the development of reflexive interfaces in different contexts.…”
Section: Open Conclusion For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the strict sense of the term, co-production in the public sector refers to the interactive process through which the providers and users of public services apply their diff erent resources and capabilities in its production and delivery. Co-production concerns the growing organised involvement of citizens in the production of their own welfare services (Brandsen and Pestoff 2006), contributing to personalise services (Prandini and Orlandini 2015) and to socially innovate governance arrangements and citizenship status (Ganugi 2018). Regarding co-creation, the involvement of end-users in the planning process as well as in service delivery is what distinguishes co-creation from co-production.…”
Section: Th E Co-creation Between System Integration and Social Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…planning, implementation, delivery, and others. (Voorberg et al 2017;Brandsen and Honingh 2016;2018;Lember et al 2019).…”
Section: Th E Co-creation Between System Integration and Social Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ostrom, 1990). Many authors such as Linebaugh (2009), Helfrich (2012), Meretz (2014), Euler (2018), and others see the Commons as a continuous process requiring participation; scholars have described the production and reproduction of Commons (Harvey, 2012;Iaione, 2012;Kip, 2015;Stavrides, 2016;Ganugi, 2018) and the governance arrangements that the actors set up for its management (i.e. Commoning institutions; Harvey, 2013;Dellenbaugh et al, 2015;Stavrides, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%