2001
DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Communication in Global Civil Society: Forces, Processes, Prospects

Abstract: The author examines the concept of global civil society (GCS) through the use of theoretical tools and empirical evidence related to the study of International Communication. He demonstrates that scholarship on GCS tends to simplify the process through which information becomes knowledge and that the state system–GCS relationship often is presented in terms of an ahistorical power dichotomy. In relation to these problems, what the author calls “GCS progressives” tend to underplay political‐economic factors sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Information plays an important role in policy processes. However, information is not knowledge (Comor, 2001). Given bounded rationality, actors—individual or corporate—cannot absorb and process all accessible information.…”
Section: The Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information plays an important role in policy processes. However, information is not knowledge (Comor, 2001). Given bounded rationality, actors—individual or corporate—cannot absorb and process all accessible information.…”
Section: The Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In either case, these claims serve to vindicate this kind of globalist outlook (which global education provides) and to empower the global activist or expert (exactly the status to which the globally educated aspire). This interpretive and institutional privilege often comes at the expense of many other actors in the world (see Comor, 2001;Kothari, 1997;Pasha & Blaney, 1998). Regions and countries with global problems become subject to a globalist "helping" regime-an infrastructure of international civil servants, donor governments, foundations, transnational nongovernment organizations, and experts and activists-that often takes for granted the kind of "pecking order" of cultures that Nandy identifies.…”
Section: Disempowerment As a Pedagogical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 Deibert (1997) provides an excellent exploration of medium theory and its implications for International Relations; see also Comor (2001). The, albeit controversial, locus classicus of medium theory is likely McLuhan (1964); an exploration of McLuhan's ideas in the contemporary setting is Horrocks (2000). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%