Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights

Abstract

Whose ideas matter? And how do actors make them matter? Focusing on the strategic deployment of competing normative frameworks, that is, framing issues and grafting private agendas on policy debates, we examine the contentious politics of the contemporary international intellectual property rights regime. We compare the business victory in the establishment of the 1994 Agreement on Trade‐Related Intellectual Property (TRIPS) in the World Trade Organization with the subsequent NGO campaign against enforcing TRIPS to ensure access to essential HIV/AIDS medicines. Our analysis challenges constructivist scholarship that emphasizes the distinction between various types of transnational networks based on instrumental versus normative orientations. We question the portrayal of business firms as strictly instrumental actors preoccupied with material concerns, and NGOs as motivated solely by principled, or non‐material beliefs. Yet we also offer a friendly amendment to constructivism by demonstrating its applicability to the analysis of business. Treating the business and NGO networks as competing interest groups driven by their normative ideals and material concerns, we demonstrate that these networks' strategies and activities are remarkably similar.

Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation

“…Some recent work, however, has noted that business actors are driven as much by ideas as by material interests, as was seen in the case of intellectual property rights norms and policy (Sell and Prakash 2004). Similar dynamics are present with respect to norms and policy surrounding plastic bags.…”

“Confusion is a fundamental state of mind”—On the peculiar intellectual career of global governance in international relations

“…8 Global governance in this context "led scholars to posit the possibility of alternative governance forms that can produce both effective and legitimate outcomes, a sterling instance in which theoretical and empirical analysis is married to practical politics" (Barnett and Sikkink, 2008: 79). In a nutshell, given the immense resources non-state actors commanded, it was argued that their integration into governance structures based on deliberation and cooperation between different stakeholders could provide more effective and more legitimate governance beyond the nation-state (Börzel and Risse, 2010: 126-128) While losing some of its argumentative momentum through the publications of critical work on the role of NGOs (Sell and Prakash, 2004;Sending and Neuman, 2006) and in particular on business (Brühl, 2007;Fuchs and Lederer, 2007), we still find in many global governance contributions a foundational believe in the value of deliberation and cooperation between different actors providing different resources for governance. Offering comprehensive research designs to determine the legitimacy and efficiency of governance initiatives, the basic assumptions that world politics is no longer the sole domain of nation states, that other "global governors" have entered the arena, and that these actors, if carefully integrated, exercise authority in legitimate ways, are rarely challenged (Avant et al, 2010).…”

Engineering for the global poor: The role of intellectual property

“…First, the lack of "market pull" seems to nullify the theoretical benefits of IP: in the near absence of profit from a product, there is little use in expending resources to protect that product from competition. Moreover, in some important cases, primarily those concerning vaccines, fears have been raised that, due to monopoly pricing on the resulting product, IP blocks access by the poor to these very products (Muzaka, 2009;Sell and Prakash, 2004). Since patents are theoretically useless as an inducement mechanism where market pull is weak and have restricted access in some cases, patenting has often been portrayed as unnecessary, perhaps even harmful to the interests of the poor.…”