2018
DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.133409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Content and Language Integrated Learning at Ukrainian and Polish Educational Systems: Challenges and Implication

Abstract: At present, Ukrainian universities are immersed into current processes of internationalisation, academic mobility and engaging into a European context, that, consequently, give rise to numerous surveys on advanced pedagogical approaches to correspond the framework of general European language learning policy. The paper aims to describe and summarise the experience of Content and Language Integrated Learning implementation (CLIL) in Ukraine. With the view of objective assessment of the survey results, we consid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many research works examining the specifics of integrated teaching implementation at education systems in different countries: Poland (Czura et al, 2009;Leshchenko et al, 2018;Papaja, 2013), Germany (Dallinger et al, 2018;Hallet, 2015), Denmark (van Kampen et al, 2020); Spain (Ardeo, 2019;Marsh, 2013;Merino and Lasagabaster, 2018); Latin America (McDougald, 2016); North America (Maguire-Fong and Mangione, 2016); India (Doraisamy and Radhakrishnan, 2013); Kazakhstan (Dontsov and Burdina, 2018); China (Xiao, 2016). But despite the fact that all education systems have their own specific features of integrated teaching implementation, all scholars stress that such integrated technique works successfully in every educational environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many research works examining the specifics of integrated teaching implementation at education systems in different countries: Poland (Czura et al, 2009;Leshchenko et al, 2018;Papaja, 2013), Germany (Dallinger et al, 2018;Hallet, 2015), Denmark (van Kampen et al, 2020); Spain (Ardeo, 2019;Marsh, 2013;Merino and Lasagabaster, 2018); Latin America (McDougald, 2016); North America (Maguire-Fong and Mangione, 2016); India (Doraisamy and Radhakrishnan, 2013); Kazakhstan (Dontsov and Burdina, 2018); China (Xiao, 2016). But despite the fact that all education systems have their own specific features of integrated teaching implementation, all scholars stress that such integrated technique works successfully in every educational environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the feedback, one can find that there are several basic types of ECBES activities which can facilitate the learners' academic achievements in ME despite the lack of linguistic experience and resources (Leshchenko, Lavrysh, & Halatsyn, 2018).…”
Section: Medical Learners and Medical English (Me) Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some way, corpus linguistics is the path to gather, organize, and analyze language. As one of the most important key terms, concordance is the "collected wordforms" (Flowerdew, 2015;Lamy & Mortensen, 2017;Sinclair, 1991) that existed in their surroundings. There is a consensus of academic and specialized processes in learning or teaching Medical English (ME) such as information summary, perspectives estimation, and conclusions' drawing is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line, Aguilar and Muñoz (2014) identified the benefits of using CLIL for engineering students in Spain. Banegas and Beamud (2020) investigated the use of CLIL in higher education in Argentina and Spain based on a duoethnographic approach; Leshchenko, Lavrysh, and Halatsyn (2018) identified operating CLIL models and strategies at Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute and measured up functioning features of this approach by means of SWOT analysis. The focus of Bentley's (2010) study was to develop tests on the professional competence of teachers in applying CLIL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%