2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of convection, overshoot, and gravity waves for the transport of dust in M dwarf and brown dwarf atmospheres

Abstract: Context. Observationally, spectra of brown dwarfs indicate the presence of dust in their atmospheres while theoretically it is not clear what prevents the dust from settling and disappearing from the regions of spectrum formation. Consequently, standard models have to rely on ad hoc assumptions about the mechanism that keeps dust grains aloft in the atmosphere. Aims. We apply hydrodynamical simulations to develop an improved physical understanding of the mixing properties of macroscopic flows in M dwarf and br… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
301
4
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
16
301
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that our values disagree for early T-dwarfs. However, the physics at the L/T transition is difficult to model, not only due to the cooling of the atmosphere but also to the clearing of the atmosphere that needs to model properly the hydrodynamics and the clouds formation (Freytag et al 2010), making the timescales uncertain. If confirmed, this low value would back Burgasser et al (2007) suggestion that the L/T transition occurs rapidly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our values disagree for early T-dwarfs. However, the physics at the L/T transition is difficult to model, not only due to the cooling of the atmosphere but also to the clearing of the atmosphere that needs to model properly the hydrodynamics and the clouds formation (Freytag et al 2010), making the timescales uncertain. If confirmed, this low value would back Burgasser et al (2007) suggestion that the L/T transition occurs rapidly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of DA white dwarfs, this was studied with an extensive comparison of twodimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations with 1D structures by Freytag et al (1996). Even the definition of the lower boundary is ambiguous: depending on whether one uses the classical stability criterion, the layers with significant convective flux, or the layers with non-zero velocities, the resulting mass in the "convection zone" can differ by orders of magnitude.…”
Section: The Convection Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some overshooting at convective boundaries does occur as a consequence of the adoption of the numerical algorithm for the determination of the convective boundaries (Lattanzio 1986). On the contrary the FRUITY, ATON and LPCODE models adopt different implementations of an exponentially decaying mixing coefficient (Freytag et al 1996) beyond the formally convective boundaries and with different intensities. While FRUITY models include strong overshooting at the bottom of the CE but no overeshooting at the PDCZ, LPCODE models adopt a moderate overshooting at the base of the PDCZ and no overshooting at the bottom of the CE.…”
Section: And Hot Bottom Burning (Hbb) To Develop At Lower Initial Masmentioning
confidence: 99%