2018
DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2018.05.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of deep learning and radiomic feature extraction in cancer-specific predictive modelling: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
87
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Deep learning is increasingly being applied to radiomics, or the detection of clinically relevant features in imaging data beyond what can be perceived by the human eye. 5 Both radiomics and deep learning are most commonly found in oncology-oriented image analysis. Their combination appears to promise greater accuracy in diagnosis than the previous generation of automated tools for image analysis, known as computer-aided detection or CAD.…”
Section: Machine Learning -Neural Network and Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Deep learning is increasingly being applied to radiomics, or the detection of clinically relevant features in imaging data beyond what can be perceived by the human eye. 5 Both radiomics and deep learning are most commonly found in oncology-oriented image analysis. Their combination appears to promise greater accuracy in diagnosis than the previous generation of automated tools for image analysis, known as computer-aided detection or CAD.…”
Section: Machine Learning -Neural Network and Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep Learning has recently shown great potential for computer-assisted diagnosis [38,40] and for prediction of response to therapy [41] in patients with lung cancer. A potential drawback of Deep Learning, however, is that the resulting features are not as easy to interpret as the hand-designed ones, nor readily linkable to clinically relevant image findings [42]. The paradox, then, is that, even if the results are good, we don't know why; as a consequence, it is hard to investigate the methods for possible sources of bias and/or mistakes (for a discussion on the perils of excessively complex algorithms, see also ([43], Ch.…”
Section: Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as these highthroughput data acquisition approaches challenge the data-to-discovery process, they drive the development of new sophisticated computational methods for data analysis and interpretation. In particular, the synergy of cancer research and machine learning has led to groundbreaking discoveries in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning for cancer * Contributed equally VARIATIONAL AUTOENCODERS FOR CANCER DATA INTEGRATION patients (Levine et al, 2019;Vial et al, 2018). Typically, such machine learning methods are developed to address particular complexities inherent in individual data types, separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have addressed and highlighted the importance of data integration at different scales (Žitnik et al, 2019;López de Maturana et al, 2019;Karczewski and Snyder, 2018;Huang et al, 2017;Gomez-Cabrero et al, 2014). In the context of analysing cancer data, it has been shown that such integrative approaches yield improved performance for accurate diagnosis, survival analysis and treatment planning (Vial et al, 2018;Gevaert et al, 2006;Thomas et al, 2014;Kristensen et al, 2014;Shen et al, 2009). In particular, Wang et al (2014) show that, for the case of 5 different cancer profiles, integrating mRNA expression, DNA methylation and miRNA data leads to more accurate survival profiles than each of the individual types of data alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%