1991
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of diet in the development of breast cancer: a case-control study of patients with breast cancer, benign epithelial hyperplasia and fibrocystic disease of the breast

Abstract: Summary A case-control study was undertaken to investigate the role of diet in women with breast cancer, and in two groups of women with benign breast disease: epithelial hyperplasia, and fibrocystic disease without hyperplasia.The study provides data which suggest that the consumption of red meat, savoury meals (pizza, pies, stew, etc.) and of starches is disadvantageous, while the consumption of chicken and fish, and of fruit, appears to be beneficial. These patterns were present for both the breast cancer p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the macronutrients that affect the GI starch intake has been directly associated with breast cancer risk in a casecontrol study after adjustment for confounding factors such as age, energy intake and alcohol consumption (Franceschi et al, 1996). Similar results were obtained by Ingram et al, (1991) while others did not show a significant relation (Rohan et al, 1988;Zaridze et al, 1991). Total carbohydrate intake in general was not associated with breast cancer risk (Table 10), although one study showed a significantly positive association (Franceschi et al, 1996) and another showed a negative association (Wakai et al, 2000).…”
Section: Breast Cancersupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the macronutrients that affect the GI starch intake has been directly associated with breast cancer risk in a casecontrol study after adjustment for confounding factors such as age, energy intake and alcohol consumption (Franceschi et al, 1996). Similar results were obtained by Ingram et al, (1991) while others did not show a significant relation (Rohan et al, 1988;Zaridze et al, 1991). Total carbohydrate intake in general was not associated with breast cancer risk (Table 10), although one study showed a significantly positive association (Franceschi et al, 1996) and another showed a negative association (Wakai et al, 2000).…”
Section: Breast Cancersupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, in this study the cereal products represented also the main source of dietary fiber suggesting these were not refined cereals. Associations of sugar intake=confectionery with breast cancer have been reported in at least eight studies; two were direct ( Franceschi et al, 1995;Favero et al, 1998), one inverse after adjustment for macronutrient energy (Zaridze et al, 1991), while the remaining showed no consistent association (Rohan et al, 1988;Iscovich et al, 1989, Ewertz & Gill 1990Ingram et al, 1991;Levi et al, 1993, Franceschi et al, 1996; Table 10). …”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High intakes of fruits and vegetables have been associated with reduced risks of many cancers, 22 including breast cancer, [23][24][25][26][27] as well as of benign breast disease 26,[28][29][30] ; but some studies 26,[31][32][33] have shown either only a moderate, or no reduction in risk of breast cancer in association with these foods. A meta-analysis of 14 casecontrol studies and 3 cohort studies showed a reduced risk of breast cancer in relation to vegetable consumption, but with significant heterogeneity among studies, and only a weak, non-significant, association with fruit intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some case-control studies showed a decrease in breast cancer risk with increased intake of the (pro)vitamins (Katsouyanni et al, 1988;Howe et al, 1990; Graham et al, 1991;Lee et al, 1991;Zaridze et al, 1991) and fibre (Iscovich et al, 1989;Howe et al, 1990;Van 't Veer et al, 1990; Graham et al, 1991;Baghurst and Rohan, 1994), whereas other case-control studies showed the opposite for (pro)vitamins (Toniolo et al, 1989;Ewertz and Gill, 1990;Richardson et al, 1991) and fibre (Katsouyanni et al, 1988;Ingram et al, 1991). Mostly negative non-significant associations between (pro)vitamin intake and the risk of breast cancer have been found in the few prospective cohort studies that have been conducted so far (Paganini-Hill et al, 1987;Graham et al, 1992;Hunter et al, 1993;Rohan et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%