2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of (dis)inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
156
5
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
13
156
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the assumption that reduced inhibitory control may foster remote associations and stimulate creativity (Radel et al., ), we have reported numerous evidence in the literature that the ability to resist (inhibit) intuitive‐heuristic reasoning leading to fixation is critical to generate creative solutions to problems at all ages by allowing one to adopt other types of reasoning (e.g., analogical thinking and conceptual expansion) belonging to System 2.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In contrast to the assumption that reduced inhibitory control may foster remote associations and stimulate creativity (Radel et al., ), we have reported numerous evidence in the literature that the ability to resist (inhibit) intuitive‐heuristic reasoning leading to fixation is critical to generate creative solutions to problems at all ages by allowing one to adopt other types of reasoning (e.g., analogical thinking and conceptual expansion) belonging to System 2.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, Goel, Eimontaite, Goel, and Schindler (2015) recently argued that insight problems (such as the RAT) are a subset of well-structured problems, while divergent problem solving tasks (such as the alternative uses and invention tasks) are a subset of ill-structured problems. Our results also echo a number of recent studies that have demonstrated the psychological separability of divergent and convergent problem solving processes (Chermahini & Hommel, 2010;Colzato et al, 2012;Hommel, Colzato, Fischer, & Christoffels, 2011;Oppezzo & Schwartz, 2014;Radel et al, 2015). We join these more nuanced arguments to call for more careful analyses of the components of creative performance (e.g., separating divergent vs. convergent processes) in future research on creativity.…”
Section: Situative Creativity 35supporting
confidence: 61%
“…While the RAT is most commonly used as a measure of creativity (e.g., Wiley, 1998), and several prior studies have examined the role of divergent processes in RAT performance (Aiello et al, 2012;Haarmann et al, 2012), we reasoned that it also heavily taps convergent processes since the final output is a single answer that is compared to a predetermined correct answer. We are not the first to treat the RAT in this way: Other recent studies have also studied the RAT as primarily a convergent task in contrast to the alternate uses task (treated as primarily measuring divergent processes), and found both dissociable effects on these tasks from their manipulations and a lack of correlation between performance on these tasks (Colzato, Ozturk, & Hommel, 2012;Oppezzo & Schwartz, 2014;Radel, Davranche, Fournier, & Dietrich, 2015). We gave participants 32 items, of varying difficulty, drawn from Mednick and Mednick (1967) and Bowers et al (1990), chosen to reflect a range of difficulty levels.…”
Section: J Chan and T J Nokes-malachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, another study showed that a decrease in cortical excitability of the lateral frontal cortex, induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation, improved performance on a divergent creativity task (Chrysikou et al 2013). Another recent study showed that exposure to high inhibition demands led to enhanced fluency in a divergent thinking task, but no such changes occurred in a convergent thinking task (Radel et al 2015). These findings suggest that when resources for inhibition were lacking, the frequency and the originality of ideas was facilitated.…”
Section: Implications For the Disinhibitory Notion Of Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 94%