2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of disturbance severity and canopy closure on standing crop of understory plant species in ponderosa pine stands in northern Arizona, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The understorey was reported to represent between 1-7% on average of the total ecosystem aboveground biomass for temperate forests (Dupouey et al 2000, Peichl & Arain 2006, Gonzalez et al 2013. Under high light conditions due to low stand density or more canopy openings, understorey biomass would be expected to be higher (Sabo et al 2009, Ares et al 2010, as more light and more resources such as water and nutrients are available for understorey primary productivity (Gonzalez et al 2013). For our cork oak stands, despite a low stand density and the presence of openings throughout the stands, the part of understorey vegetation in the total aboveground ecosystem biomass varied on average between only 0.4 to 2.3% of total stand aboveground biomass for stand densities over 200 stems ha -1 and below 100 stems ha -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understorey was reported to represent between 1-7% on average of the total ecosystem aboveground biomass for temperate forests (Dupouey et al 2000, Peichl & Arain 2006, Gonzalez et al 2013. Under high light conditions due to low stand density or more canopy openings, understorey biomass would be expected to be higher (Sabo et al 2009, Ares et al 2010, as more light and more resources such as water and nutrients are available for understorey primary productivity (Gonzalez et al 2013). For our cork oak stands, despite a low stand density and the presence of openings throughout the stands, the part of understorey vegetation in the total aboveground ecosystem biomass varied on average between only 0.4 to 2.3% of total stand aboveground biomass for stand densities over 200 stems ha -1 and below 100 stems ha -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In P. ponderosa Dougl. (ponderosa pine) forest perennial grass cover decreased and invasive species increased as fire intensity and litter consumption increased (Armour et al 1984;Griffis et al 2001;Bataineh et al 2006;Sabo et al 2009). …”
Section: Herbaceous and Ground Cover Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conifer plantations, thinning usually increases species diversity, particularly during younger stages (Thomas et al, 1999;Ito et al, 2006;Lindgren et al, 2006;Utsugi et al, 2006;Wilson and Puettmann, 2007;Ishii et al, 2008;Widenfalk and Weslien, 2009;Ares et al, 2010). Furthermore, several thinning experiments have demonstrated that species diversity usually increases monotonically with the level of thinning (Thomas et al, 1999;Parker et al, 2001;Moya et al, 2009; but see Ares et al (2010)); however, intensive thinning or clear cutting occasionally facilitates the dominance of one or a few understorey species, due to the dominance of herbs and shrubs that strongly inhibit the regeneration of hardwoods, thereby reducing understorey diversity (Alaback and Herman, 1991;Ito et al, 2006;Nagai and Yoshida, 2006;Sabo et al, 2009). Together, these studies suggest that an optimal thinning intensity exists for maximising species diversity in conifer plantations (see Jobidon et al, 2004), although the mechanism by which diversity is maximised has not yet been fully elucidated, primarily due to the lack of monitoring during the process of hardwood recruitment at different thinning intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%