2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Musculoskeletal Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI typically shows a low-to-moderate signal on T1-weighted images and a more variable, moderate-to-high signal on T2-weighted images, which may be difficult to distinguish from malignancy. Recently, dual-energy CT, which uses X-rays with two different levels of energy, has been reported to be useful for discriminating between uric acid crystals and bone and calcified lesions [6,7]. In our third case, it was difficult to detect the gout nodule by MRI, and the diagnosis was made by dual-energy CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…MRI typically shows a low-to-moderate signal on T1-weighted images and a more variable, moderate-to-high signal on T2-weighted images, which may be difficult to distinguish from malignancy. Recently, dual-energy CT, which uses X-rays with two different levels of energy, has been reported to be useful for discriminating between uric acid crystals and bone and calcified lesions [6,7]. In our third case, it was difficult to detect the gout nodule by MRI, and the diagnosis was made by dual-energy CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…That is why we used DECT. This imaging modality obtains two exposures at different energy levels, which allows material decomposition and acquisition of virtual monochromatic images [ 5 ]. The discriminated materials can be color-coded and overlaid onto CT images to aid diagnosis and localization of a lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they showed that BME detection both in the appendicular skeleton and the spine has a very good diagnostic performance, with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 93%, respectively, for appendicular bones, and 84% and 98% for the spine. BME detection is also helpful in nontraumatic cases such as the hands in acute inflammatory arthritis, 19,20 BME in sacroiliitis, 21 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, 2,22,23 osteomyelitis, and bone tumors. 3,24 In any oncologic imaging center, differentiating between osseous metastatic disease and benign osseous lesions is a common dilemma.…”
Section: Virtual Non-calcium Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%