The role of educational factors in the development of lexical splits

Abstract

While variationist literature on sound change has mostly focused on chain shifts and mergers, much less is written about splits (Labov, 1994, 2010). Previous literature shows that the acquisition of splits is unlikely unless motivated by social factors (Labov, 1994). The current study presents an apparent time analysis on the development of two phonemic splits, the initial /s/-/ʂ/ contrast and the initial /ɻ/-/l/ contrast, in Xiamen Mandarin, a contact variety of Putonghua, the official language in China. Statistical results showed similar patterns for both variables: younger speakers and female speakers are leading the change; the distinction between two phonemes are more distinct in wordlist than in the sociolinguistic interview. By examining the sociolinguistic situation in Xiamen, the paper discusses two potential factors that have led to these sound changes: the regional campaign for Putonghua and the emphasis of Pinyin, a phonetically-based orthography, in the education system.

The social meaning of a merger: The evaluation of an Andalusian Spanish consonant merger (ceceo)

“…The role of orthography cannot be underestimated in the social awareness and evaluations of ceceo and distinción . As Labov (1994:345) notes, ‘the school system would logically be the major instrument for a social program to reverse mergers’, as seen in a few lexical splits (Wyld 1936; Abdel-Jawad 1981; Lin 2018). Different from vocalic mergers, prescriptive Peninsular Spanish presents a direct grapheme-to-phoneme correspondence for coronal fricatives.…”

Rhyming style, persona, and the contested landscape of authentic Chinese hip hop

“…Prescriptively, it primarily follows the grammatical rule of Northern Mandarin and the phonetic pattern of Beijing Mandarin (Chen, 1999). However, in every communication, speakers often use the term to refer to any attempt at the lingua franca, even when it deviates from the prescribed standard (Lin, 2018). In this paper, we use the term in the latter sense.…”