2017
DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2017.1346071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of empathy in training social work students in motivational interviewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a follow-up article using the same study sample as Pecukonis and colleagues (2016), Greeno, Ting, Pecukonis, Hodorowicz, and Wade (2017) focus specifically on the impacts of MI training on student empathy as measured by the self-report Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ; Spreng, McKinnon, Mar, & Levine, 2009) and behavioral coding using the MITI (Moyers et al, 2010). While the training as usual group reported higher empathy at baseline on the TEQ, MITI empathy scores did not differ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a follow-up article using the same study sample as Pecukonis and colleagues (2016), Greeno, Ting, Pecukonis, Hodorowicz, and Wade (2017) focus specifically on the impacts of MI training on student empathy as measured by the self-report Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ; Spreng, McKinnon, Mar, & Levine, 2009) and behavioral coding using the MITI (Moyers et al, 2010). While the training as usual group reported higher empathy at baseline on the TEQ, MITI empathy scores did not differ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the eight studies related to MI training with CW workers and students studying to become CW workers, notable differences in training duration, intensity, and modality make general conclusions difficult. However, trainees generally described MI favorably (Forrester, McCambridge, Waissbein, Emlyn-Jones, & Rollnick, 2008), and some studies showed training increased worker empathy (Forrester et al, 2018; Greeno, Ting, Pecukonis, Hodorowicz, & Wade, 2017) and self-efficacy (Scourfield et al, 2012). Additionally, recurring training, and training that uses booster sessions, appears more effective than a 1-time 2-day training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, assessment of practice has been conducted in the field setting. However, field instructors frequently rely on student self-report to assess competence because they are often not actually observing students with clients (Beddoe et al, 2011; Greeno, Ting, Pecokonis, Hodorowicz, & Wade, 2017; Maidment, 2000). EPAS outlines the importance of using assessment processes that do not rely on self-report and are based on “demonstration of the competency in real or simulated practice situations” (CSWE, 2015a, p. 19).…”
Section: Simulation-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering cost and logistical challenges of MI training and our study results, this innovative aspect of providing coding training as a method of teaching MI warrants additional attention. Given the role of, for example, empathy in human service interactions (Greeno, Ting, Pecukonis, Hodorowicz, & Wade, 2017), an accessible and cost-efficient training such as this that results in significant participant skill gain within a low-risk environment is a potentially valuable resource. Results of this pilot study indicate additional research is warranted to explore the promising practice of a coding-based MI training for building relational skills, including empathy and partnership.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%