2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus and other premalignant conditions of the esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
141
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
141
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that surveillance practices during the follow-up period most likely reflected these guidelines, and that these practices had not yet been significantly impacted by updates to the guidelines in 2011 and 2012, which increased acceptable intervals to 3-5 years. [8,9] Surveillance at our center was largely performed using a recall database, where patients 6 were contacted based on an endoscopist's recommendation at the time of a sEGD and pathology review; these recommendations were unlikely to have been modified by updates to the guidelines.…”
Section: Index and Surveillance Endoscopiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assumed that surveillance practices during the follow-up period most likely reflected these guidelines, and that these practices had not yet been significantly impacted by updates to the guidelines in 2011 and 2012, which increased acceptable intervals to 3-5 years. [8,9] Surveillance at our center was largely performed using a recall database, where patients 6 were contacted based on an endoscopist's recommendation at the time of a sEGD and pathology review; these recommendations were unlikely to have been modified by updates to the guidelines.…”
Section: Index and Surveillance Endoscopiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part because of recent data indicating a lower-than-expected risk of adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's epithelium [7], more recent guidelines have extended the surveillance interval to 3-5 years. [8,9] While most endoscopists practice endoscopic surveillance for NDBE [10], there is considerable variation in surveillance patterns and adherence to guideline recommendations [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Particularly in community practice, adherence to surveillance guidelines is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence does exist for the surveillance of patients post caustic ingestion, with endoscopy starting at approximately 15 years after the insult. Following the initial endoscopy, surveillance intervals of 1-3 years have been recommended [1,22]. Tylosis, a rare genetic condition predisposing to hyperkeratosis and oesophageal cancer, has also been advocated for surveillance every 1-3 years, beginning from the age of 30 onwards [1].…”
Section: T2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines proposed by the principal societies provide different intervals for surveillance depending on the grade of dysplasia detected on pathology specimens (17)(18)(19)(20) (Table I).…”
Section: Risk Of Progression and Endoscopic Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%