2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of epistasis on the evolution of recombination in host–parasite coevolution

Abstract: a b s t r a c tAntagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites is known to affect selection on recombination in hosts. The Red Queen Hypothesis (RQH) posits that genetic shuffling is beneficial for hosts because it quickly creates resistant genotypes. Indeed, a large body of theoretical studies have shown that for many models of the genetic interaction between host and parasite, the coevolutionary dynamics of hosts and parasites generate selection for recombination or sexual reproduction. Here we investig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These models revealed that coevolution can generate diverse gene-frequency dynamics ranging from selective sweeps to sustained cycles. More recent work has refined the conditions under which coevolution favors sexual reproduction or recombination Agrawal 2006;Salathé et al 2008;Kouyos et al 2009), while other recent theory has expanded coevolution's reach by showing that it might drive other important evolutionary transitions. For instance, coevolution can generate selection for changes in ploidy levels Oswald and Nuismer 2007), patterns of mate choice Otto et al 2008), rates of mutation (M'Gonigle et al 2009), and even mating system (Agrawal and Lively 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models revealed that coevolution can generate diverse gene-frequency dynamics ranging from selective sweeps to sustained cycles. More recent work has refined the conditions under which coevolution favors sexual reproduction or recombination Agrawal 2006;Salathé et al 2008;Kouyos et al 2009), while other recent theory has expanded coevolution's reach by showing that it might drive other important evolutionary transitions. For instance, coevolution can generate selection for changes in ploidy levels Oswald and Nuismer 2007), patterns of mate choice Otto et al 2008), rates of mutation (M'Gonigle et al 2009), and even mating system (Agrawal and Lively 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the interactions between host loci mediating parasite resistance need to be epistatic (Kouyos et al 2007) or display dominance (Agrawal & Otto 2006). In the absence of epistatic interactions among loci, strong LD of constant sign build up quickly which cause strong selection against recombination (Kouyos et al 2008). Data from plant and animal studies suggest that epistatic interactions among disease resistance loci are indeed prevalent (Kover & Caicedo 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Multiplicative matching-alleles model. This model is presented as a counterpoint to the matching-allele model, as it does not implicitly involve epistatic interactions between resistance alleles at different loci [4,29]. Instead, the number of matched alleles determines host and parasite fitness in a multiplicative fashion, leading to intermediate, or partial, estimates of resistance.…”
Section: Are Complex Traits Resulting From Host-parasite Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While epistasis is an integral component of many models of disease resistance and antagonistic coevolution (but not all [4,29]; Figure 2), the contribution of epistatic variance to susceptibility remains difficult to evaluate using conventional QTL mapping methods. With the advent of next generation sequencing approaches, however, new insights can be generated into the genetic architecture of susceptibility [23,30].…”
Section: Reconciling Quantitative Genetic and Host-parasite Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%