2016
DOI: 10.1353/pla.2016.0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Evidence-Based Practice in Collaborations between Academic Librarians and Education Faculty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relying on the team's expertise in library sciences, medical humanities education, and health services and educational research, we conducted a scoping review and qualitative metasynthesis. The purpose of a scoping review is to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity; such reviews can be especially helpful in complex areas of inquiry that have not previously been mapped .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on the team's expertise in library sciences, medical humanities education, and health services and educational research, we conducted a scoping review and qualitative metasynthesis. The purpose of a scoping review is to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity; such reviews can be especially helpful in complex areas of inquiry that have not previously been mapped .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature surrounding CRCs focuses on the composition of these collections and the addition of technology, such as computer-based games or programs, 3D printers, or software (Shelley, Derden, and Gibson, 2018). Other literature focuses on collaborating with Education faculty for selection or deselection of materials, joint lessons, and user focused studies (Adams et al, 2016;Correll & Bornstein, 2018). Gelber and Uhl (2013) examined the fiscal management of CRCs, finding that their management was sometimes the sole responsibility of the library and other times it was shared with the Education department.…”
Section: Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, the literacy skillset is seen as an independent asset that instrumentally has a one-way effect on people's social practices and cognitive functioning (Street, 2003). The generic or autonomous model is reflected in many definitions and models of IL promoted by the academic library community, including SCONUL's seven pillars of information literacy model (SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy, 2011), which is often used as a theoretical framework of studies (e.g., Cope & Sanabria, 2014;Sandercock, 2016), and versions of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher education (Association of College andResearch Libraries, 2000, 2016), also used for numerous studies (Gross & Latham, 2012;Seiler et al, 2012;Adams et al, 2016). Alternatively, IL can be regarded "as a range of contextualized information practices" (Lupton & Bruce, 2010, p. 12).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%