2010
DOI: 10.1080/13569771003593920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of external factors in advancing non-liberal democratic forms of political rule: a case study of Russia's influence on Central Asian regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to what the United States used to be accused of during the Cold War, but such efforts by various actors continue today. Russia is the most conspicuous (Tolstrup 2009, Jackson 2010. For example, after the OSCE's active role in the colored revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, Russia (unsuccessfully) pushed for institutional reforms to curtail the independence of OSCE observers (Fawn 2006).…”
Section: The Dark Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to what the United States used to be accused of during the Cold War, but such efforts by various actors continue today. Russia is the most conspicuous (Tolstrup 2009, Jackson 2010. For example, after the OSCE's active role in the colored revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, Russia (unsuccessfully) pushed for institutional reforms to curtail the independence of OSCE observers (Fawn 2006).…”
Section: The Dark Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model of 'democracy' is premised on the idea of the strong state as a fundamental condition for Russia's national survival and an important factor in the success of its political, security and economic reforms. The Russian leadership has advocated this perspective by stating, repeatedly, how the establishment of a strong state was a prerequisite for the revival of Russia's great power status (Jackson 2010). Strong state has been framed as an enduring feature of the Russian political tradition, which has also favoured a popular leader personifying the sovereign state irrespective of his democratic credentials (Smith 2006).…”
Section: Russia's Views On Democracy and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moscow and Beijing, therefore, have sought some convergence between their own and Central Asian states' perspectives on governance and international relations (Bader, Grävingholt, and Kästner 2010;Kavalski 2007). Russia and China have espoused a set of competing ideas for political and economic development, and presented attractive models for maintaining stability and generating prosperity without democratization (Jackson 2010;Kavalski 2010aKavalski , 2010b). …”
Section: Non-western Frames Of Democracy and Alternative Models Of Gomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Russia's policy in the "near abroad" has also been subject to a scholarly debate that has concentrated especially on its political influence, namely: the promotion of authoritarian forms of governance (Jackson 2010) and Russia's management of (in-) stability in the neighborhood (Tolstrup 2009). In addition, the motives behind and instruments in Russian foreign policy have attracted academic interest (Ambrosio 2009;Bader, Grävingholt, and Kästner 2010;Tolstrup 2015), and scholars have analyzed different forms of Russian soft and hard power (Bogomolov and Lytvynenko 2012;Hill 2006;Leonard and Popescu 2007;Sherr 2013).…”
Section: The Contested Neighborhood: Empirical Dynamics and Conceptuamentioning
confidence: 99%