1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales

Abstract: ITie purpose of this paper is to examine the usefulness of factor analysis in developing and evaluating personality scales that measure hmited domain constructs The approach advocated follows from several assumptions that a smgle scale ought to measure a smgle construct, that &ctor analysis ought to be applied routinely to new personality scales, and that the factors of a scale are important if it can be demonstrated that they are diiFerenbally related to other measures A detailed study of the Self-Monitonng S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

59
1,236
1
42

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,855 publications
(1,338 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
59
1,236
1
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Item-total correlations above .20 are seen as appropriate (Streiner, Norman, & Cairney, 2015). Inter-item correlations between .2 and .4 are seen as an optimal level of homogeneity, values above .5 indicate the redundancy of some items because of equality (Briggs & Cheek, 1986). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item-total correlations above .20 are seen as appropriate (Streiner, Norman, & Cairney, 2015). Inter-item correlations between .2 and .4 are seen as an optimal level of homogeneity, values above .5 indicate the redundancy of some items because of equality (Briggs & Cheek, 1986). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the scale items tap a single, general factor measuring a unitary attribute (Briggs & Cheek, 1986). In addition, two tests examining test-retest reliability over 4-and 5-month intervals provided evidence for the scale's temporal stability.…”
Section: The Scc Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…O modelo proposto (Taylor, Bagby, & Parker, 2003) considera que cada item deve aferir apenas um fator, diferenciando-se assim do modelo fatorial exploratório, em que cada item apresenta saturações nos diversos fatores com valores próprios superiores a 1. Partindo-se da hipotética associação entre as dimensões do construto avaliado para a amostra (Briggs & Cheek, 1986) (Taylor et al, 2003).…”
Section: Análise Fatorial Confirmatóriaunclassified