2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of family firms’ generational heterogeneity in the entry mode choice in foreign markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
3
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the concept of added cultural distance has become more prominent in the broader IB domain (Kim et al, 2020 ). Also, the more recent articles in this cluster pointed to the topic of control of FDI by family firms (Del Bosco & Bettinelli, 2020 ) which is in line with the emerging trends in the IB field (Mariotti et al, 2021 ). These pointed toward the following research directions: What is the role of added-cultural distance in determining MNE entry modes?…”
Section: Major Themes In Mir Corpussupporting
confidence: 62%
“…At the same time, the concept of added cultural distance has become more prominent in the broader IB domain (Kim et al, 2020 ). Also, the more recent articles in this cluster pointed to the topic of control of FDI by family firms (Del Bosco & Bettinelli, 2020 ) which is in line with the emerging trends in the IB field (Mariotti et al, 2021 ). These pointed toward the following research directions: What is the role of added-cultural distance in determining MNE entry modes?…”
Section: Major Themes In Mir Corpussupporting
confidence: 62%
“…There is undoubted academic interest in knowing whether corporate decisions differ between companies depending on the presence or not of a family in the shareholding and key decision-making positions (i.e., Mariotti et al 2020), especially in the field of corporate social responsibility due to the principles of socioemotional wealth that determine the decision-making processes in these companies (García-Sánchez et al 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the generation which run the firm, several studies found that founder or first generations outperform better and later generations are associated with a decrease in performance (Miller et al, 2011;Morck et al, 2000;Villalonga & Amit, 2006), although the opposite relationship also exists (Sraer & Thesmar, 2007). For internationalisation strategy, the results about the influence on the generation ruling the firm are also inconclusive (Mariotti et al, 2021) and more research is necessary to understand the relationship between the generation and international decisions (Segaro et al, 2014). Following the SEW perspective, in FFs governed by the founder, i.e., first generation FFs, the SEW orientation is dominant (Le-Breton Miller & Miller, 2013).…”
Section: Family Involvement As a Moderating Variable In Internationalisation-performance Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FFs, the socioemotional-wealth (SEW) theory has studied this area of research and it points out that this kind of firms could be less internationalised. Even though an increasing number of studies have dealt with different aspects of the internationalisation process in the context of FFs, such as their propensity to international growth (Calabrò et al, 2017;Pukall & Calabró, 2014), the entry mode choice (Andreu et al, 2020;Boellis et al, 2016;Mariotti et al, 2021;Yamanoi & Asaba, 2018), or the influence of firm's capabilities (Alayo et al, 2021;Hernández-Perlines, 2018), few studies have carried out an in-depth analysis of the relationship between international activity and performance considering different aspects of family involvement, being one of the main topics that needs a further attention (Kim & Gao, 2013). Therefore, more studies are needed on the relationship between internationalisation and performance in FFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%