2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of genomic structural variation in the genetic improvement of polyploid crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many complex cellular mechanisms that determine plant fertility are governed by genes requiring specific dosage balance and simultaneous expression (Lloyd et al ., ), and whose loss is therefore expected to reduce fertility. A multitude of gene dosage/copy number‐dependent traits have been identified in B. napus , some influencing plant reproductive systems such as flowering time (Schiessl et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many complex cellular mechanisms that determine plant fertility are governed by genes requiring specific dosage balance and simultaneous expression (Lloyd et al ., ), and whose loss is therefore expected to reduce fertility. A multitude of gene dosage/copy number‐dependent traits have been identified in B. napus , some influencing plant reproductive systems such as flowering time (Schiessl et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Homoeologous exchanges, as well as presence-absence variants and other karyotypic changes, have now been conclusively linked to phenotypic changes in many species, including polyploid crops (reviewed by Schiessl et al, 2019). In fact, a number of homoeologous exchanges (almost all examples involve duplication-deletion events, as reciprocal translocations are harder to detect) have now been demonstrated to have been selected for in crops: in Brassica napus (rapeseed), winter and spring crop types are differentiated by homoeologous exchanges involving major flowering time regulators such as FLC (Schiessl et al, 2017), and effects of homoeologous exchanges on disease resistance and glucosinolate metabolism have also been observed (Stein et al, 2017;Hurgobin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Homoeologous Recombination Events Can Generate Novel Variatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural variants (SVs) include differences in copy number (copy number variation; CNV) of genes and repeats, presence-absence variation (PAV), various forms of chromosomal change such as inversions (Huang and Rieseberg, 2020) and translocations, and homoeologous exchanges (HEs; see Mason and Wendel, this issue). In fact, the two or more co-resident genomes of allopolyploids almost certainly contain structural variations, which have been shown to accumulate in all plant genomes studied (Saxena et al, 2014;Fuentes et al, 2019;Gabur et al, 2019;Schiessl et al, 2019). Thus, divergence of two diploids is accompanied by the natural accumulation of structural differences, which then become combined in a common nucleus during allopolyploidization.…”
Section: Structural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%