1996
DOI: 10.1080/07349165.1996.9725913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Gis in Improving Environmental Assessment Effectiveness: Theory vs. Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many advantages of employing GIS in environmental impact assessments (EIAs) have been noted (for example, Eedy, 1995;Antunes et al, 1996;Joao and Fonseca, 1996). Some of the attributes listed are the ability to handle large data sets in a spatial framework and the facility for cartographic display, which is a powerful means of conveying results in a way that is easily interpreted (Cassettari, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many advantages of employing GIS in environmental impact assessments (EIAs) have been noted (for example, Eedy, 1995;Antunes et al, 1996;Joao and Fonseca, 1996). Some of the attributes listed are the ability to handle large data sets in a spatial framework and the facility for cartographic display, which is a powerful means of conveying results in a way that is easily interpreted (Cassettari, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Antunes et al (1996), GIS is widely used for the presentation of baseline environmental information and to a lesser extent for impact evaluation. Joao and Fonseca (1996), in a survey on the use of GIS by EIA practitioners, found that it was not restricted to the production of maps, but was also being used for analysis and modelling. However, they also noted that GIS was not used in the public participation phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1990 1992 1997 1998 2000 2003 2007 2008 2011 2012 GIS is improving environmental assessment effectiveness. João and Fonseca (1996) * Maps with better quality presenting scale and datum. Utilization of GIS tools.…”
Section: Environmental Impact Statements Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canter and Canty (1993) Lack of procedural rules for the preparation of the EIA Jendroska and Sommer (1994) EIS system is seen as a bureaucratic requirement to obtain project approvals Ross (1994) EIA suffers from political influence Ross (1994) How should social impacts be weighted Burdge and Vanclay (1996) GIS is improving environmental assessment effectiveness João and Fonseca (1996) Cumulative impacts are not properly addressed in EIA Burris and Canter (1997) Synergistic and interactive impacts are not well understood, and they are difficult to accurately predict. Cooper and Canter (1997) EIA should contribute to final project design Gutman (1997) Concept of social licence in IA Dare et al (2014) Method to predict cumulative impacts on the basis of landscape vulnerability evaluation Pavlickova and Vyskupova (2015) Few evidence was found that the Ecosystem Services concept is improving current ESIA practice Rosa and Sánchez (2015) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%