The role of group membership continuity and multiple memberships on mental well‐being amongst post‐operative stoma patients

Bule, Brandon; Frings, Daniel

doi:10.1002/pon.4006

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It reflects the extent to which a person is part of multiple social groups (e.g., community groups, sports groups) and not necessarily organizational groups like the other fields. The main topics encompassed here are the effects of being part of multiple social groups on individuals' (mental) health and well-being (e.g., Bule and Frings, 2015;Kinsella et al, 2020;Gallagher et al, 2021;Rees et al, 2022) or cognitive processing and performance (e.g., Woods et al, 2018;Beadleston et al, 2019). Furthermore, it also covers multiple group membership in relation to other social psychology themes, such as self-esteem (Jetten et al, 2015), aging (Ysseldyk et al, 2013), divorce (Lampraki et al, 2019), resilience in violence and abuse (Haslam et al, 2022), and protest (Besta et al, 2019).…”

Section: Study Citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multiple group membership benefits the health and well-being of individuals because they have access to multiple social identities that keep them connected to other people, provide structure and meaning to social relationships (Greenaway et al, 2016). For example, the study of Bule and Frings (2015) shows the positive role (for patient well-being) of maintaining group memberships post-operative/after surgery. In the context of acquired brain injury belonging to multiple groups lowered depression symptoms because exposure to multiple groups gave participants the chance to practice and develop self-regulatory skills (Kinsella et al, 2020).…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multiple teams, multiple projects, multiple groups at the intersection of (multiple) research fields: A bibliometric study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-teaming is a concept studied across a variety of disciplines. While using a bibliometric approach on 255 research papers extracted from Web of Science, we aimed to depict the architecture of the multi-teaming concept across academic disciplines and time. Results of citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling analyses identified four major fields looking at the concept of multi-teaming. The fields emerged over time from fragmentation to integration and acknowledging similarities. We identify gaps and propose (multi)-disciplinary research ideas that can benefit the field of multi-teaming.

show abstract

Section: Study Citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple teams, multiple projects, multiple groups at the intersection of (multiple) research fields: A bibliometric study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…becoming a person with significant physical impairment). Such identity transitions (even when positive) are recognised to be psychologically challenging events, associated with both positive and negative experiences and outcomes (Bule & Frings, 2016;Gleibs et al, 2011;Jones & Jetten, 2011). Social identities are themselves dynamic constructs -defined in part by the immediate social world an individual occupies and perceives (Turner, 1982).…”

Section: Changes In Identity Over Timementioning

confidence: 99%

New converts and seasoned campaigners: the role of social identity at different stages in the addiction recovery journey

Frings

Wood

Albery

2021

Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social identities associated with recovery are protective of relapse from addiction. How such identities develop and differentially link to outcomes at different points of the recovery journey and across multiple recovery attempts is relatively unknown. The current study utilised a pre-existing cross-sectional dataset (n ¼ 237 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) members, 50% male, 49.4% female and 0.6% female-tomale, aged between 19 and 71 years) to explore these issues. Relationships between AA identity, quit efficacy (a proxy for recovery maintenance) and AA meeting attendance (over the last month) were tested. The moderating effects of length of AA attendance during the current recovery episode and first vs. subsequent quit attempts on the identity-efficacy link were also tested. Levels of social identity were stable amongst those in the early in their current recovery through to those who have more experience, but the relationships between identity and efficacy differed. While those early on in their current AA attendance showed a positive relationship between identities and frequency of attending meetings, those with more long-standing attendance reported social identification unrelated to involvement. Our results suggest that social identities may be particularly protective for those who are on their first quit, suggesting recovery formation and transition may be a priority.

show abstract

“…While multiple group memberships may be generally beneficial in terms of mental health and during times of stress and transition (see Bule & Frings, 2016; Dingle et al, 2019; Gleibs et al, 2011; Haslam et al, 2016; Jones & Jetten, 2011), they may have a specific paradoxical impact in terms of epidemic EIDs. Multiple group memberships are thought to function in part by increasing social capital (resources made available through social others, Häuberer, 2011).…”

Section: Multiple Group Membership As a Protective Factor?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Group Membership, Optimistic Bias, and Infection Risk in the Context of Emerging Infectious Diseases

Frings

Wills

Sykes

et al. 2023

European Journal of Health Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Background: Understanding psychosocial factors which impact responses to emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) is vital in managing epidemics and pandemics. Two under-researched areas in this field are the interactive roles of optimistic bias (underestimation of the likelihood of negative events occurring to the self, relative to others) and group membership (a factor observed to be psychologically protective, but infection risk enhancing). Aims: The current study aimed to test the relationships between optimistic bias and membership of multiple groups upon EID-related emotional and psychological responses and behavioral intentions. Methods: Participants from the UK and US ( N = 360) rated how they would evaluate and respond to a fictitious EID immediately before the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns in a correlational study. Results: Negative relationships were observed between optimistic bias and perceived infection vulnerability, infection prevention strategies, and perceived EID severity. Multiple group membership correlated negatively with germ avoidance, but positively with emotional responses such as disgust and increased perceived vulnerability to infection – factors linked to avoiding infection. Multiple group memberships and optimistic bias were unrelated. Limitations: The study focussed on a fictitious disease and relies on cross-sectional data and behavioral intentions. Conclusions: These findings build upon the small evidence base on the role of optimistic bias in EID management and suggest that multiple group membership is unlikely to increase optimistic bias. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings for EID management are discussed.

show abstract

The role of group membership continuity and multiple memberships on mental well‐being amongst post‐operative stoma patients

Cited by 8 publications

References 9 publications

Multiple teams, multiple projects, multiple groups at the intersection of (multiple) research fields: A bibliometric study

Multiple teams, multiple projects, multiple groups at the intersection of (multiple) research fields: A bibliometric study

New converts and seasoned campaigners: the role of social identity at different stages in the addiction recovery journey

Multiple Group Membership, Optimistic Bias, and Infection Risk in the Context of Emerging Infectious Diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About