2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06935-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of human papillomavirus genotyping for detecting high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in HPV-positive women with normal cytology: a study from a hospital in northeastern China

Abstract: Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting cervical cancer and its precursors. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of high-risk HPV genotypes and evaluate the role of HPV genotyping triage for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ and cervical cancer (HSIL+) in HPV-positive women with normal cytology. Methods A retrospective study was perf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the main HR-HPV genotypes detected among women with high-grade SILs (HSILs) in Shanghai were HPV 16, 58, 52, and 33 [ 28 ]; although, the HPV 52 and 33 infection rates in HSIL cases were significantly lower than those in cases of cervicitis/negative for intraepithelial ledion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and low-grade SILs (LSIL). However, a study in northeast China showed that women infected with HPV 16, 18, 31, and 33 had a high incidence of HSILs [ 29 ]. A limitation of this study is that there was no pathological data available (e.g., cervical cytology and histology results), and thus it is not possible to determine the relationships between HPV genotype and pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the main HR-HPV genotypes detected among women with high-grade SILs (HSILs) in Shanghai were HPV 16, 58, 52, and 33 [ 28 ]; although, the HPV 52 and 33 infection rates in HSIL cases were significantly lower than those in cases of cervicitis/negative for intraepithelial ledion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and low-grade SILs (LSIL). However, a study in northeast China showed that women infected with HPV 16, 18, 31, and 33 had a high incidence of HSILs [ 29 ]. A limitation of this study is that there was no pathological data available (e.g., cervical cytology and histology results), and thus it is not possible to determine the relationships between HPV genotype and pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of HPV infection and the genotype distribution in men are serious clinical issues owing to the prevention of genital cancer in men and, consequently, HPV infection in women. Nonetheless, most studies on HPV infection in China have been conducted in women ( 10 , 11 ), and data on the epidemiology of HPV infection in men are quite rare. Moreover, the HPV infection rate varies between nations and regions ( 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-risk HPV genotypes mainly include HPV 16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59,66,68,83, and other genotypes mainly related to the occurrence of squamous epithelial tumors, such as cervical cancer and penile cancer (3). Low-risk genotypes mainly include HPV 6,11,40,42,43,44,61,70,72,81, and other genotypes that promote various benign lesions such as genital condyloma acuminatum (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summarized global meta-analysis indicated that HPV16 was the most frequently detected type; HPV18 ranked second place in CIN3 and invasive cervical cancer (ICC); HPV45 was more common than other non-HPV16/18 types in ICC ( Guan et al., 2012 ). However, in China, HPV31/33/52/58 has a higher risk of HSIL+ than HPV18/45 in HPV-positive and cytology-negative women ( Zhang et al., 2020a ). Women with non-HPV16 18/45-positive and cytology-negative are followed up, which may be the reason for the low sensitivity of AHPV genotyping with reflex LBC triage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%