2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of in situ coral nurseries in supporting mobile invertebrate epifauna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coral cryptofauna are composed of metazoan organisms living in inter-and intra-skeletal structures of hard corals, including dead corals and coral rubble (Enochs, 2011), and play an important role in maintaining coral reef functionality by capturing and recycling nutrients and providing biomass to upper trophic levels (Richter et al, 2001;Enochs, 2011;Kramer, Bellwood & Bellwood, 2013). Coral cryptofauna inhabit a variety of marine environments and have been used as proxies for benthic diversity in past studies (Takada, Abe & Shibuno, 2007;Enochs, 2011;Takada et al, 2014;Wee et al, 2019). Rubble cryptofaunal surveys can allow comparisons of the animal community living at each location in order to evaluate differences in biodiversity.…”
Section: Coral Outplanting and Restoration Efforts In Okinawamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coral cryptofauna are composed of metazoan organisms living in inter-and intra-skeletal structures of hard corals, including dead corals and coral rubble (Enochs, 2011), and play an important role in maintaining coral reef functionality by capturing and recycling nutrients and providing biomass to upper trophic levels (Richter et al, 2001;Enochs, 2011;Kramer, Bellwood & Bellwood, 2013). Coral cryptofauna inhabit a variety of marine environments and have been used as proxies for benthic diversity in past studies (Takada, Abe & Shibuno, 2007;Enochs, 2011;Takada et al, 2014;Wee et al, 2019). Rubble cryptofaunal surveys can allow comparisons of the animal community living at each location in order to evaluate differences in biodiversity.…”
Section: Coral Outplanting and Restoration Efforts In Okinawamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two datasets can be considered complementary, as the information they give integrate each other at different spatial scales and for different components of the coral reef community. Sampling coral rubble can provide a variety of data including abundances and diversity of cyptofaunal groups that are often overlooked when dealing with reef restoration, although rubble fauna data have been used before to study biodiversity in different environments (Takada et al, 2014) as well as in coral nurseries (Wee et al, 2019).…”
Section: Rubble Cryptofauna Vs Living Coral Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies evaluating factors that support or endanger biodiversity are based on the relation between reef fishes and corals, underestimating the importance of small invertebrates that compose the greatest number of species associated with corals (Stella et al, 2010(Stella et al, , 2011. Even if some studies have evaluated the influence of invertebrates, habitat structure has been characterized qualitatively (Wee et al, 2019) or simplified to only one structural variable (Vytopil & Willis, 2001). Efforts to quantify multiple elements of habitat structure influencing the associated fauna on corals are scarce, except for Stella et al (2010) and Nogueira et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, coral cryptofauna composed of metazoan organisms living in inter-and intra-skeletal structures of hard corals (Enochs 2011) are extremely important in maintaining trophic systems and hence coral reef functionality due to their capability to capture and recycle nutrients (Richter et al 2001;Enochs 2011). Coral rubble cryptofauna have been used as proxies for benthic diversity, and studies have shown that many cryptic species live within rubble in different environments (Takada, Abe & Shibuno 2007;Enochs 2011;Takada et al 2014) including coral nurseries (Wee et al 2019). Rubble cryptofauna surveys can allow comparisons of the animal community living at each location in order to evaluate differences in biodiversity and examine the effects of coral restoration on these communities.…”
Section: Restoration In Okinawamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two datasets can be considered complementary, as the information they give integrate well each other at different spatial scales and for different components of the coral reef community. Sampling coral rubble can provide a variety of data including abundances and diversity of cyptofaunal groups that are often overlooked when dealing with reef restoration, although rubble fauna data have been used before to study biodiversity in different environments (Takada et al 2014) as well as in coral nurseries (Wee et al 2019).…”
Section: Rubble Cryptofauna Vs Living Coral Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%