2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-016-3691-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Lattice Misfit on Heterogeneous Nucleation of Pure Aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the crystal plane spacings between the three sets of parallel crystal planes were the same or double. This means that there was lattice distortion at the interface, which was consistent with our previous study, where the nucleated-phase Al fit the substrate with limited lattice distortion within a small lattice misfit (f < 3.1%) [25]. These studies prove that both in situ MgAl 2 O 4 (using physical force) and endogenous MgAl 2 O 4 (controlling for the heating temperature) are possibly potent heterogeneous nucleation substrates in the heterogeneous nucleation of Al alloys.…”
Section: Exogenous Mgal 2 Osupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the crystal plane spacings between the three sets of parallel crystal planes were the same or double. This means that there was lattice distortion at the interface, which was consistent with our previous study, where the nucleated-phase Al fit the substrate with limited lattice distortion within a small lattice misfit (f < 3.1%) [25]. These studies prove that both in situ MgAl 2 O 4 (using physical force) and endogenous MgAl 2 O 4 (controlling for the heating temperature) are possibly potent heterogeneous nucleation substrates in the heterogeneous nucleation of Al alloys.…”
Section: Exogenous Mgal 2 Osupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lattice parameters of the three phases are remarkably different from each other, and the three interfaces are accommodated by a periodic of extra or missing planes at the interfaces . Therefore, the total interfacial energy ( E t ) consists of two parts: the coincidence dislocation energy ( E cd ) and strain energy ( E s ) per unit area at the interface, and can be calculated as:Et=Ecd+EsEcd=Eb28π(1ν)(1+ν)lnhitaliccdb+1×1ma0ES=E1νhitaliccdF2hcd=bF14π(1+ν)lnhitaliccdb+1where b is burgers vector, E is elastic modulus, ν is poison ration, h cd is the critical thickness to introduce the coincidence dislocations . The distance of the coincidence dislocations is ma 0 , the total length of the coincidence dislocations will be 1/ ma 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on the substrate-induced liquid layers, which have been extensively studied in the field of lubrication, epitaxial growth, superhydrophobic materials [6], energy-storage materials [8,14], etc. Apart from the aforementioned applications, the liquid layers have also been interpreted as pre-nucleation structures [15,16], which can enhance or weaken the nucleation process [7,17] and dictate their structural features. A further understanding of the substrate-induced liquid layers, in particular the in-plane atomic arrangement, can provide new insights into the heterogeneous nucleation mechanisms [17], and is also beneficial to many industrial applications, such as the design of nucleating agents [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%