The Role of Livelihood Assets’ Endowment in Adoption of Rural Livelihood Strategies: An Intra-Regional Comparison of District Bhimber, AJ&amp;K

Abbassi, Faisal Azeem; Ullah, Atta; Hashmi, Muhammad Saim; Hussain, Khadim; Akhter, Nasim

doi:10.17582/journal.sja/2020/36.1.258.271

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Purik production is sold for IDR 6,000/kg (wet leaves) and IDR 23,000 to IDR 24,000/kg (powder). This condition is in line with the opinion of Abbassi et al (2020), who state that natural assets are closely related and farmers use much nature.…”

Section: Human Assetsupporting

confidence: 88%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Community livelihood assets of forest village management in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

ROSLINDA,

SABATHINO,

PRATAMA

et al. 2024

Biodiversitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Roslinda E, Sabathino P, Pratama YA, Supriadi, Eva J. 2024. Community livelihood assets of forest village management in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25: 664-672. Village forest is a community-based forest management scheme in the social forestry program. At the same time, the management of village forest is local village communities that fulfill their daily needs by utilizing existing natural resources. Nanga Lauk Village Forest Management has successfully carried out activities on the social forestry program. This study aims to explain the livelihood system of the Nanga Lauk Village community to meet the family's living needs in managing the village forest. The study was conducted using a survey method in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, and the community was used as informants. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews guided by a list of questions, documentation, and a review of supporting literature. Data analysis was carried out descriptively, qualitatively and by Pentagon asset analysis. The assets owned by the people of the Nanga Lauk Village are resources of human, natural, financial, social, and physical. Natural and physical resources are the main assets used by society to meet life's needs, followed by social, human, and financial. So, the strategy that can be implemented is a consolidation based on socio-economic status. Meanwhile, based on activities to increase income, the community can apply livelihood strategies in agricultural sectors because of abundant natural resources. Skill training is needed for the community because a low level of human assets will shape the mindset of farmers regarding their inability to do other work on the side which should be able to improve their standard of living.

show abstract

Section: Human Assetsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Nature is the main component of the Nanga Lauk community in carrying out farming activities. Abbassi et al (2020) argue that natural assets are closely related and widely used in farming. The higher use of natural resource assets is because the availability of natural resources is still quite abundant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community livelihood assets of forest village management in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

ROSLINDA,

SABATHINO,

PRATAMA

et al. 2024

Biodiversitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Access to non-agricultural assets: In rural areas, ownership of non-agricultural assets is a sign of wealth status and is considered a means of livelihood risk management (Abbassi et al, 2020). As expected, the model result shows that access to and ownership of physical assets like jewelry, radios, and furnished beds are positively associated with household resilience to food insecurity at probability of less than 0.05, 0.05, and 0.01.…”

Section: Interpretation Of Model Resultssupporting

confidence: 53%

Determinants of Household Resilience to Food Insecurity for Comparison: the Case of Chencha District, Southern Ethiopia

Dereje,

Tilahun,

Yirgu

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Food insecurity is a historical global human challenge, but has yet remained a burning development agenda. The capacity to withstand and recover from food insecurity shocks and stresses refereed as resilience, which is determined by a strand of factors. This paper deals with measuring and; identifying major determinants of household resilience to food insecurity among weaving-based livelihood system in Chencha district. Methods Multi-stage sampling technique was employed to generate data from 303 sample households through household survey, focus group discussion, and key informant interviews. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, household resilience index, chi-square test, one-way ANOVA and econometric model (probit regression). Results The household survey revealed that 59.04% households were non-resilient, 24.42% were moderately resilient, 10.89% resilient and 4.95% highly resilient. The Chi-square and one-way ANOVA tests have shown a meaningful and statistically significant difference among resilience categories. Finally, probit model analysis indicated that access to credit, average years of family education, crop diversity, income diversity, landholding size, TLU, expected crop harvest, expected cash income from fruit trees, frequency of extension contact, FCS, annual food expenditure, ownerships of Radio, Jewelry, furnished bed, membership in local associations, and distance to local market have positively influenced the likelihood of attaining higher household resilience at CI 95% or P<1%, 5% and 10%. Whereas; lack of access to mobile phone, inability to read and write, family business, formal employment, and transfers of payment have decreased likelihood of households to achieve higher resilience level. Conclusions Therefore, improving household access to credit, education, income diversification, livestock and land, agricultural extension services, membership to local associations, mobile service, and income diversification would enhance household income and food security, which could in turn improve household resilience to food insecurity.

show abstract

“…It is an idea applied to the association between individuals and societies within the same environment [41]. A livelihood strategy is an imperative dynamic force that can boost business performance [42]. Researchers have found that a livelihood strategy particularly influences an individual's motivation to participate in ecological protection policies that will increase firm performance [43].…”

Section: Moderating Role Of Environmental Perceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Livelihood Strategies Influence Post-Epidemic Business Performance? Investigation of Social Capital and Environmental Perception

Wang

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Livelihood strategies are a combination of activities and actions that individuals undertake to accomplish their desired goals. The current study aimed to examine the impacts of livelihood strategies on business performance. This study explored social capital as a mediator between livelihood strategies and business performance. This study further investigated how environmental perception strengthens livelihood strategies and business performance. For data collection, a quantitative research method and a random sampling technique were used. Data were collected through 550 questionnaires from small–medium enterprises (SMEs) in China. To test the study hypotheses, structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed. The findings confirm the notion that livelihood strategies are positively associated with business performance. The results also corroborate the notion that social capital mediates the association between livelihood strategies and business performance. The outcome validates the notion that livelihood strategies and business performance are further articulated when environmental perception is higher. Environmental perception moderated the impacts of livelihood strategies on business performance via social capital. The current research provides a better understanding of how livelihood strategies facilitate amplified business performance via social capital and the valuable role of environmental perception in research models.

show abstract

The Role of Livelihood Assets’ Endowment in Adoption of Rural Livelihood Strategies: An Intra-Regional Comparison of District Bhimber, AJ&K

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Community livelihood assets of forest village management in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Community livelihood assets of forest village management in Nanga Lauk Village, Kapuas Hulu District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Determinants of Household Resilience to Food Insecurity for Comparison: the Case of Chencha District, Southern Ethiopia

Do Livelihood Strategies Influence Post-Epidemic Business Performance? Investigation of Social Capital and Environmental Perception

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About