1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00138.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection

Abstract: Genetic models of maternal effects and models of mate choice have focused on the evolutionary effects of variation in parental quality. There have been, however, few attempts to combine these into a single model for the evolution of sexually selected traits. We present a quantitative genetic model that considers how male and female parental quality (together or separately) affect the expression of a sexually selected offspring trait. We allow female choice of males based on this parentally affected trait and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, by generating covariance between parental provisioning behaviour and offspring begging intensity, maternal effects enable offspring to show a rapid evolutionary response to changes in provisioning behaviour, counteracting any evolutionary advantage that parents collectively might temporarily have gained (Moore et al 1997;Wolf et al 1999;Stamps 2003;West-Eberhard 2003;Kölliker et al 2005;Moore & Pizzari 2005). The covariance of parental and offspring phenotypes thus promotes social (co)evolution fuelled by parent-offspring conflict (Moore et al 1997;Wolf et al 1999;Kölliker et al 2005). However, whether the maternal effects we have identified here currently serve the evolutionary interests of parents, offspring or both parties remains to be determined.…”
Section: Results (A) Phenotypic Correlation Between Nestling Begging mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by generating covariance between parental provisioning behaviour and offspring begging intensity, maternal effects enable offspring to show a rapid evolutionary response to changes in provisioning behaviour, counteracting any evolutionary advantage that parents collectively might temporarily have gained (Moore et al 1997;Wolf et al 1999;Stamps 2003;West-Eberhard 2003;Kölliker et al 2005;Moore & Pizzari 2005). The covariance of parental and offspring phenotypes thus promotes social (co)evolution fuelled by parent-offspring conflict (Moore et al 1997;Wolf et al 1999;Kölliker et al 2005). However, whether the maternal effects we have identified here currently serve the evolutionary interests of parents, offspring or both parties remains to be determined.…”
Section: Results (A) Phenotypic Correlation Between Nestling Begging mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brighter plumage should allow yearling eastern bluebirds advantages in acquiring nest sites (Siefferman and Hill 2005b) and translate into higher reproductive success Hill 2003, 2005a). Because male and female bluebirds honestly advertise parental quality via structural plumage coloration (Liu et al 2007;Hill 2003, 2005a) and because offspring color is influenced by parent quality, selection may drive the elaboration of this trait (Wolf et al 1999;Qvarnström and Price 2001). Typical reflectance spectra of the blue wing feathers of male (black line) and female (gray line) nestling eastern bluebirds Box plots of brightness of plumage coloration of nestling male (diagonal lines) and female (white) eastern bluebirds from reduced and enlarged broods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related theoretical framework for understanding the evolution of correlated male traits as well as for considering how female traits may become enhanced or reduced as a result of interactions with males, is the covariance approach to social interactions (52)(53)(54)(55). This methodology separates the effects of natural selection acting on traits possessed by focal individuals, from the effects of social selection on these same traits, caused by interactions focal individuals may have with potential rivals or with potential mates themselves.…”
Section: Quantitative Analyses Of Mating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%