1980
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90116-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of membrane surface charge in the control of photosynthetic processes and the involvement of electrostatic screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average thickness of the granum layers is 20 nm 6 2 nm, which is also the thickness of the flanking stroma lamellae. Within the granum, the surfaces of adjacent layers or discs are separated by 3 to 4 nm, in agreement with previous reports (Nir and Pease, 1973;Arntzen and Briantais, 1975) and in line with predictions made by electrical double-layer theories (Rubin and Barber, 1980;Dubois et al, 1991). Note that the granum layers, while presenting a distinct granular texture, are topologically continuous with the stroma membranes that penetrate the granum at multiple levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The average thickness of the granum layers is 20 nm 6 2 nm, which is also the thickness of the flanking stroma lamellae. Within the granum, the surfaces of adjacent layers or discs are separated by 3 to 4 nm, in agreement with previous reports (Nir and Pease, 1973;Arntzen and Briantais, 1975) and in line with predictions made by electrical double-layer theories (Rubin and Barber, 1980;Dubois et al, 1991). Note that the granum layers, while presenting a distinct granular texture, are topologically continuous with the stroma membranes that penetrate the granum at multiple levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As already emphasised in a number of publications from my laboratory the above properties indicate that the cation-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and thylakoid stacking changes must be controlled by a general electrostatic phenomenon rather than some specific chemical mechanism [12,18,28,29]. Attempting to find explanations for the cation-induced effects we, and Duniec et al [30] have turned our attentions to the established electrostatic theory of Gouy and Chapman [3 1,321 and in particular the application of this theory to the concepts which underlie the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory of stability of lyophobic colloids [33].…”
Section: Elsevierlnorth-holland Biomedical Pressmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…When electrostatic screening is high then charged surfaces are able to approach each other. We have shown that the sensitivity of chlorophyll fluorescence and thylakoid stacking to different cation levels, types and mixtures, can be correlated with changes in electrostatic screening as determined by calculation of the integrated space charge density adjacent to the membrane surface [28,29]. Duniec et al were also able to predict the experimental findings for mixed electrolyte conditions using an extension of the DLVO approach [30] and we too have equated our calculations with a force parameter [29,34] In order to attempt to answer the above question and formulate a model the following properties must be considered :…”
Section: Elsevierlnorth-holland Biomedical Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Adjacent to each domain of one type of charge, the magnitude of the surface charge density may be much greater than that of the net surface charge density s on the membrane surface overall; in that case, the electric field strength E near the surface may be strong enough to align water dipoles. Our unpublished calculation of E according to the Gouy -Chapman theory [39] for an unstacking buffer medium gave an E value at the surface such that a water dipole placed in the electric field has an energy of about 22kT, where k is Boltzmann's constant. On the other hand, in a stacking buffer medium such as one containing MgCl 2 (which is abundant in the chloroplast stroma), E is fourfold smaller, so that a loss of alignment of water dipoles is expected.…”
Section: In the Dark The Predominant Attractive Force That Counteracmentioning
confidence: 99%