Client Psychology 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119440895.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Mental Accounting in Household Spending and Investing Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of field studies have subsequently documented diverse violations of fungibility [for a recent review, see Zhang and Sussman 2018]. Virtually all of these focus on the question of whether money that is framed as coming from or designated as being earmarked for a specific category of consumption is, in fact, spent on that category [as discussed by Thaler 1985].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of field studies have subsequently documented diverse violations of fungibility [for a recent review, see Zhang and Sussman 2018]. Virtually all of these focus on the question of whether money that is framed as coming from or designated as being earmarked for a specific category of consumption is, in fact, spent on that category [as discussed by Thaler 1985].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of this third factor can be explained by previous research on malleable accounting pointing out the ambiguity of restaurant expenses in mental categorization. According to this, expenses for a restaurant visit could be mentally booked as "evening entertainment, " as "costs for food, " or even as "work costs" if it is work-related dinner (Cheema and Soman, 2006;Zhang and Sussman, 2018). Owing to the ambiguous evaluation of restaurant expenses also in the present study, this spending category was excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies applied different methods such as interviews (e.g., Adams and Webley, 2001;Ashby and Webley, 2008a,b;Muehlbacher and Kirchler, 2013) or quasiexperiments in the field (e.g., Jackson et al, 2005;Helion and Gilovich, 2014). Surprisingly, in particular, questionnaire surveys are largely underrepresented in mental accounting literature (the few existing survey studies focus predominantly on the questions whether individuals restrict themselves to predefined budgets and how longsighted their financial planning horizon is; Zhang and Sussman, 2018), although questionnaires are a cost-efficient tool for data collection and allow us to survey target populations that normally would not participate in lab experiments. A consequence of the lack of survey research is that attempts to measure mental accounting practices -in contrast to experimentally inducing a situation that leads to one or another practice -are scarce.…”
Section: Assessing Individual Differences In Mental Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations