2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Multiplicity in Disk Evolution and Planet Formation

Abstract: The past decade has seen a revolution in our understanding of protoplanetary disk evolution and planet formation in single star systems. However, the majority of solar-type stars form in binary systems, so the impact of binary companions on protoplanetary disks is an important element in our understanding of planet formation. We have compiled a combined multiplicity/disk census of Taurus-Auriga, plus a restricted sample of close binaries in other regions, in order to explore the role of multiplicity in disk ev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
279
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
22
279
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of Kraus et al (2012), these studies were not sensitive to the tight binary systems to which our study was especially sensitive. Kraus et al (2012) and Cheetham et al (2015), sensitive to similar binary separations to our study, find the disk fraction among close visual binaries (0.1-40 au) in Taurus-Auriga and Ophiuchus to be lower than for single stars. Their studies did not distinguish between circumbinary TDs and other disk types (e.g., debris disks).…”
Section: Sample Sensitivity To Companionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the exception of Kraus et al (2012), these studies were not sensitive to the tight binary systems to which our study was especially sensitive. Kraus et al (2012) and Cheetham et al (2015), sensitive to similar binary separations to our study, find the disk fraction among close visual binaries (0.1-40 au) in Taurus-Auriga and Ophiuchus to be lower than for single stars. Their studies did not distinguish between circumbinary TDs and other disk types (e.g., debris disks).…”
Section: Sample Sensitivity To Companionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, several studies (Ghez et al 1997;White & Ghez 2001;Cieza et al 2009;Duchêne 2010;Kraus et al 2012) have found protoplanetary disk fractions are lower for young ( 5 Myr) binary systems with a<50 au than for single stars or wider binaries. With the exception of Kraus et al (2012), these studies were not sensitive to the tight binary systems to which our study was especially sensitive.…”
Section: Sample Sensitivity To Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binaries with separations closer than ∼40 AU show a lower frequency of infrared excess compared with single or wide binary sources (e.g., Monin et al 2007;Cieza et al 2009;Kraus et al 2012). This suggests that these triples and quadruples should have a higher fraction of mixed pairs.…”
Section: Mixed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the close components should exhibit rapid disk clearing (Monin et 4 al. 2007;Cieza et al 2009;Kraus et al 2012), whether this parameter affects our discussion or not is explored in later sections. Binarity in these systems, especially those that are widely separated, has yet to be confirmed by multi-epoch astrometry; therefore, many of these systems are candidates of binaries.…”
Section: Sample and Archival Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the single star fraction -a crucial statistic for giant planet formation (e.g. Kraus et al 2012) -decreases from ∼60-70% for M-dwarfs (Fischer & Marcy 1992;Bergfors et al 2010) to ∼54% for solar-type stars (Duquennoy & Mayor 1991;Raghavan et al 2010) to near 0% for the most massive stars (Preibisch et al 1999), further separating M-dwarfs from AFGK stars as the most numerous potential planet hosts of all the stellar classes (Lada 2006). About 25% of all Doppler-confirmed planets with M sin i < 30 M ⊕ are orbiting M-dwarfs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%