2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp111377h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Nanopore Geometry for the Rectification of Ionic Currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
166
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
166
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar simulations have previously been done for nanopores 36,37 and for nanopipettes. 31 The geometry used for the simulations is shown in Supporting Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar simulations have previously been done for nanopores 36,37 and for nanopipettes. 31 The geometry used for the simulations is shown in Supporting Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…3). Even if the concentration of ions close to the tip of the nanopipette is changing under conditions of ion rectification, the concentration far from the tip should be independent of the sign of the applied voltage 36,37 and the electric field in that region can be estimated by I/(A×K), where A is the cross-sectional area of the nanopipette in the studied region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] Due to the conical shape of the nanopore, when a negative potential is applied to the interior of the nanopore relative to the exterior, positively charged K + ions move from the bulk solution towards the interior of the pore while negatively charged Cl -ions move in the opposite direction. However, since the pore wall is negatively charged, K + accumulate at the pore orifice while the transit of Clions is partially blocked, resulting in an accumulation of both ions and a conductance higher than the bulk value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 11 The use of the Nernst-Planck (NP) equation to describe ion fluxes is reasonable when the applied pressure is zero and the electro-osmotic flow is negligible, conditions that match those used in this experiment. [48][49][50][51] Solving the coupled Poisson and NernstPlanck equations as a function of temperature requires that D i for K + and Cl -are known as a function of temperature. We used the Stokes-Einstein relationship to estimate the ion diffusion coefficients:…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,45,60,62 Analytical approaches, such as utilizing equation 3 or similar equations for calculating the nanopipette radius or resistive properties, often at a fixed applied bias, 55,56 may evidently become inaccurate under these conditions, as the surface charge of the nanopipette is not generally considered. While there has been much work on the study and simulation of the ICR phenomena at nanopipettes in low ionic strength, 60,62,63 quantification of the nanopipette surface charge and understanding the nanopipette current response is a difficult task owing to a lack of more complete tip characterization methods.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Existing Methods For Nanopipette Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%