2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of native species in urban forest planning and practice: A case study of Carolinian Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban vegetation is expected to deliver regulating benefits, and there is uncertainty about whether the displacement of the "traditional" urban forest by edible vegetation may result in a trade-off between different ecosystem services (Almas and Conway, 2016). As an example, while the importance of urban vegetation to store carbon and ameliorate microclimate has been recognized by a number of studies (Nowak and Crane, 2002;Armson et al, 2012;Wilkes et al, 2018), as well as by UN Sustainable Development Goals, the studies on the potential of food forests to provide these benefits are still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban vegetation is expected to deliver regulating benefits, and there is uncertainty about whether the displacement of the "traditional" urban forest by edible vegetation may result in a trade-off between different ecosystem services (Almas and Conway, 2016). As an example, while the importance of urban vegetation to store carbon and ameliorate microclimate has been recognized by a number of studies (Nowak and Crane, 2002;Armson et al, 2012;Wilkes et al, 2018), as well as by UN Sustainable Development Goals, the studies on the potential of food forests to provide these benefits are still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This common preference reflects the desire to preserve local biodiversity (Almas and Conway 2016). It can also be explained by the fact that local species use local resources more efficiently and are more likely to support the biodiversity of native animal species (McKinney 2002;Burghardt et al 2009).…”
Section: Urban Forestry: Resilient and Well-adapted Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although trees provide a multitude of benefits in the urban setting, they can also create problems for urban dwellers and influence species-selection due to perceived nuisance or risk (Duinker et al 2015). Some trees produce more pollen and other allergens than others (Almas and Conway 2016). Some residents may prefer to plant smaller trees to avoid shading gardens and flower beds (Fraser and Kenney 2000), while others consider damage to infrastructure (Pearce et al 2015) and habitat provisioning for undesirable wildlife (Pearce et al 2015).…”
Section: Tree-species Traits and Nuisancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…contractors, landscapers, foresters, community planting groups), play an important role in determining the species composition of trees planted on public land. For example, Almas and Conway (2016) found that municipalities adhering to a UFMP were more likely to enhance native species representation in the canopy compared to municipalities without a UFMP.…”
Section: Urban Forest Targets and Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%