2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of node fillet, unit-cell size and strut orientation on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V lattice materials additively manufactured via laser powder bed fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, these specimens exhibit a more evident cross-sectional size variation (see Table 1). This peculiar trend has also been observed in the work of Dallago et al, 11 concerning cubic lattice structures, where it was noticed that if the main load bearing struts of the lattice were printed vertically (90 ), fracture occurred at the node, alternatively, if the main load bearing struts were printed parallel to the build plane (0 ), failure occurred along the strut gauge length. In Figure 4, the SEM fracture surfaces of one specimen for each batch are reported.…”
Section: Surface Fracture Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, these specimens exhibit a more evident cross-sectional size variation (see Table 1). This peculiar trend has also been observed in the work of Dallago et al, 11 concerning cubic lattice structures, where it was noticed that if the main load bearing struts of the lattice were printed vertically (90 ), fracture occurred at the node, alternatively, if the main load bearing struts were printed parallel to the build plane (0 ), failure occurred along the strut gauge length. In Figure 4, the SEM fracture surfaces of one specimen for each batch are reported.…”
Section: Surface Fracture Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
“…6 Until now, most of the work has been addressed to the understanding of the fatigue response of different types of lattices but little work has been focused on the sub-unital elements of the cell units, namely, struts and junctions. [7][8][9] In a previous work of the authors, 10 the fatigue behavior of thin struts and their dependency on the building orientation has been examined, while in the work of Dallago et al 11 and of Latture et al, 12 the role of strut junctions and of the fillet radius have been investigated in cubic and octet lattice structures, respectively. From these works, it has been revealed that junctions are a weak point of architected materials, due to the stress concentration and that improving the junction geometry by filleting can be beneficial in terms of fatigue resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above-mentioned topology-related advantages are also reflected in the mechanical properties of prosthetic devices at a macro-scale level [ 13 , 14 ]. In fact, AM lattice structures exhibit a tunable bone-mimicking mechanical behavior in terms of Young’s modulus and fatigue strength as well as a bone-like mass transport behavior [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. In particular, the possibility of tailoring its stiffness, reducing the mismatch between the implant and bone tissue, together with the compatibility with new titanium alloys (i.e., β-Ti alloys), guarantee a lower risk of stress shielding, implant loosening, and adjacent bone degeneration [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the continuous technological improvement of L-PBF, the manufacturing of lattice structure still remains quite challenging due to the small feature size and complex shape. In this regard, Dallago et al [25] observed that node geometry and printing directions have a relevant impact on the fatigue behavior of lattice structures and can be tailored to improve fatigue life. In addition, the dependence from defects and strut irregularities has been addressed numerically by Boniotti et al [26] by way of a finite element model based on the as-manufactured geometry, which has been reconstructed by CT-scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%