The role of personality in employee developmental networks

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to integrate scholarship on personality, mentoring, developmental relationships, and social networks in delineating how employees with particular personality characteristics are more or less likely to be involved in four types of developmental networks.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews scholarship on personality characteristics and developmental relationships to identify a set of distinct personality characteristics proposed to be related to employees' tendencies to develop four types of developmental networks. These network types are defined based on high or low relationship strength and high or low relationship diversity in employee ties with others. We develop propositions delineating the nature of expected relationships of these personality characteristics with developmental network types.FindingsThe paper identifies five personality characteristics – interdependent/independent self‐construal, core self‐evaluations, openness to experience, conscientiousness, and extroversion/introversions – and explained how each should be related to employees' tendencies to develop the four types of developmental networks. These networks have been described as opportunistic, entrepreneurial, receptive, and traditional developmental networks, based upon the strength and the diversity of network relationships.Originality/valueThe paper suggests that personality variables are potentially valuable for understanding how individuals develop particular types of developmental relationships, an area that deserves more research attention. It is noted that developmental relationships have been shown to be related to both employees' objective career outcomes such as promotions and salary progress, and subjective outcomes such as career and job satisfaction.

An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects

“…Conceptually, however, a handful of studies have extended their work, suggesting that protégé factors such as personality traits (e.g., introversion/extroversion, conscientiousness) (Dougherty, Cheung, & Florea, 2008), an individual's developmental stage (Chandler & Kram, 2005), age, gender, expatriate status, socioeconomic status (Higgins, Chandler, & Kram, 2007), and relational expectations (Cotton, 2010) influence the type of network individuals are likely to form, as well as their expectations for particular developers. A few other papers have elaborated on contextual influences, suggesting the type of developmental network needed by a focal individual depends upon the industry or profession (Baker & Lattuca, 2010;Higgins, 2007), the organization's culture, and/or characteristics of the host country (Shen, 2010).…”

Groupthink and Project Performance: The Influence of Personal Traits and Interpersonal Ties

“…However, social network theory suggests that personal traits deeply influence the way in which people develop their social network (Dougherty et al. ) and value personal connections (Bendoly et al. ).…”

Ethical Decision-Making: The Role of Self-Monitoring, Future Orientation, and Social Networks

“…Not everyone is fit for cultivating social relationships, let alone relations that someday might serve the purpose of promoting one's illicit self-interests. While there are potentially many personality characteristics that could influence the creation and maintenance of social networks (Dougherty, Cheung, & Florea, 2008), there are two expected to meet the requirements for affecting both network development and unethical decision-making: self-monitoring and future orientation.…”