2010
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbq013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of product differentiation for contract choice in the agro-food sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Germany, the percentages of chicken meat traded by contracts over total sales, in the decade 1991-2002, increased from 3.6 to 5.1%. In Italy, this share passed from 0.1 to 9.3%; in Spain, it went from 13.1 to 25.4%; in France from 6.7 to 17.7; in the Netherlands from 5.2 to 9.4%; and in the UK from 11.2 to 30.6% (Jang and Olson 2010).…”
Section: Vertical Coordination In the Food Sector-literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Germany, the percentages of chicken meat traded by contracts over total sales, in the decade 1991-2002, increased from 3.6 to 5.1%. In Italy, this share passed from 0.1 to 9.3%; in Spain, it went from 13.1 to 25.4%; in France from 6.7 to 17.7; in the Netherlands from 5.2 to 9.4%; and in the UK from 11.2 to 30.6% (Jang and Olson 2010).…”
Section: Vertical Coordination In the Food Sector-literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More specifically, some US sectors used to get provisions from the spot markets (e.g., wheat, oilseeds, pork meat, and tobacco) noticeably increased the use of contracts in the period 1991-2005. In the cases of wheat and pork meat, the percentages of total production value sold through vertical coordination contracts increased noticeably from 5.9 to 7.5% and from 11 to 65.6% (Jang and Olson 2010).…”
Section: Vertical Coordination In the Food Sector-literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluate interaction based on frequency, information exchange, resource exchange and communication quality. These factors are selected based on previous research focusing on collaboration in supply chains [8,26,47,50,60,64,65,68,71]. Moreover, the drivers to participate are evaluated based on the expected social gains and motivation as these factors have been identified as indispensable in multi-stakeholder processes [73,74].…”
Section: Dimension 2: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%