2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of rotor coning in helicopter proneness to collective bounce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within ARISTOTEL, a closed-loop aeroelastic experiment involving collective bounce was presented and discussed by Masarati et al in [13]. In [14], Muscarello et al pinpointed the phase margin reduction introduced by the main rotor coning mode in the collective pitch-heave loop transfer function as the key factor in the manifestation of collective bounce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within ARISTOTEL, a closed-loop aeroelastic experiment involving collective bounce was presented and discussed by Masarati et al in [13]. In [14], Muscarello et al pinpointed the phase margin reduction introduced by the main rotor coning mode in the collective pitch-heave loop transfer function as the key factor in the manifestation of collective bounce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 14 shows the vertical acceleration of the helicopter during a short transient before the maneuver is initiated, after the system has been perturbed impulsively. The figure shows that for nominal gear ratio (G = 1.0) the oscillations associated with the interaction between the main rotor coning mode (a major playing factor in collective bounce, as pointed out in [43]) and the pilot biodynamics quickly vanish. For G = 1.8 the oscillations persist, whereas for G = 2.0 they diverge.…”
Section: B Results Of the Coupled System Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 14 shows the vertical acceleration of the helicopter during a short transient before the maneuver is initiated, after the system has been perturbed impulsively. The figure shows that for nominal gear ratio (G = 1.0) the oscillations associated with the interaction between the main rotor coning mode (a major playing factor in collective bounce, as pointed out in [52]) and the pilot biodynamics quickly vanish. For G = 1.8 the oscillations persist, whereas for G = 2.0 they diverge.…”
Section: B Results Of the Coupled System Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%