2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of S100P and IMP3 in the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Both markers were sensitive and specific for diagnosis of PDA. The staining pattern for S100P was easier to evaluate than IMP3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That none of 296 analyzed squamous cell carcinomas from other organs of origin were Napsin A positive further emphasizes that this protein is virtually absent in cells with squamous differentiation. It is of note that other investigators have reported Napsin A positivity in 0–10% of pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas in studies analyzing 14–569 tumors [ 16 , 18 , 22 , 24 , 46 48 , 50 , 52 , 57 59 , 61 65 , 67 69 ]. One possible reason for a perceived Napsin A positivity in squamous cell carcinomas that we and others encountered is entrapped normal lung tissue with Napsin A positive hyperplastic pneumocytes or Napsin A positive intra-alveolar macrophages between cancer cells [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That none of 296 analyzed squamous cell carcinomas from other organs of origin were Napsin A positive further emphasizes that this protein is virtually absent in cells with squamous differentiation. It is of note that other investigators have reported Napsin A positivity in 0–10% of pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas in studies analyzing 14–569 tumors [ 16 , 18 , 22 , 24 , 46 48 , 50 , 52 , 57 59 , 61 65 , 67 69 ]. One possible reason for a perceived Napsin A positivity in squamous cell carcinomas that we and others encountered is entrapped normal lung tissue with Napsin A positive hyperplastic pneumocytes or Napsin A positive intra-alveolar macrophages between cancer cells [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…More than 70 studies have previously analyzed Napsin A expression in tumors by IHC. The studies showed a wide range of Napsin A positivity for each tumor entity, for example, published Napsin A positivity rates ranged from 0% to 100% in adenocarcinoma of the lung [ 11 , 13 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 43 66 ], 0%–48% in papillary thyroid carcinoma [ 11 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 24 ], 0%–52% in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [ 6 , 13 , 15 19 , 22 , 24 ], 0%–17% in small cell carcinoma of the lung [ 13 , 22 , 50 , 61 , 63 ], 0–10% in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung [ 16 , 18 , 22 , 24 , 46 48 , 50 , 52 , 57 59 , 61 65 , 67 69 ], 69–100% in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary [ 7 , 19 , 25 , 27 32 , 34 ], 72%–97% in papillary renal cell carcinoma [ 6 , 16 18 , 20 22 ] and 67%–89% in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the endometrium [ 7 , 30 , 70 , 71 ]. The analysis of a large number of different tumor entities under highly standardized conditions enabled us to clarify the relative importance of Napsin A expression across tumor entities and to generate a ranking list according to the expected rate of Napsin A positivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, high S100A14 mRNA expression correlated with poor prognosis. S100P is an oncogenic event in many types of tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, breast cancer and ovarian cancer (Wang et al, 2006;Ezzat et al, 2016;Bai et al, 2018). In ovarian cancer, S100P was shown to be positively correlated with CA125 and poor prognosis (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cystic lesions have the potential for malignant neoplastic transformation and are considered malignant precursor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) whereas serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) are considered benign lesions. Ezzat et al 2016 and Senoo et al 2018 demonstrated sensitivity, and speci city of IMP3 on cytology specimens for PAC were 91.2%, 86.7%, and 87.9%, 100%, respectively, with total accuracy 90.3% and 90.8%, respectively (23)(24). Our ndings concluded that using of combined IMP3 immunohistochemical staining with cytology diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions has sensitivity, and speci city of 78.2% and 95.8% with total accuracy 84.3% compared with 64.1%, 100%, and 89% sensitivity, speci city, and total accuracy of cytology diagnosis only, respectively.…”
Section: Eus Approach Is Not Only Minimally Invasive Technique With Low Complications But Also It Provides Usmentioning
confidence: 98%