2020
DOI: 10.5719/hgeo.2020.142.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of shopping centres in the metropolization process in Fortaleza (Brazil) and Lisbon (Portugal)

Abstract: Considering that shopping centres are increasingly connected with global capital flows, this article focuses on the role of this retail concept in the process of metropolization. Using Lisbon and Fortaleza metropolises, we have developed a case study methodology to unfold the relationship between the spatial dissemination of shopping centres and the evolution of both metropolises. We have concluded that internationalisation of capital through investments in the shopping centres has produced urban-based impacts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, during the period of 1995-2007, it is this transformation of the city and region into a more polycentric organization [76] that is captured in the remaining maps. Firstly, the absolute and percent variance of the number of outlets is in line with studies that show how the urban evolution of the city proceeds [77]. In a broader picture, the data demonstrate the loss of retail in the inner city, as well as the opposite evolution of the other less central areas of the city.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, during the period of 1995-2007, it is this transformation of the city and region into a more polycentric organization [76] that is captured in the remaining maps. Firstly, the absolute and percent variance of the number of outlets is in line with studies that show how the urban evolution of the city proceeds [77]. In a broader picture, the data demonstrate the loss of retail in the inner city, as well as the opposite evolution of the other less central areas of the city.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%