The role of social support and social networks in smoking behavior among middle and older aged people in rural areas of South Korea: A cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough the number of studies on anti-smoking interventions has increased, studies focused on identifying social contextual factors in rural areas are scarce. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of social support and social networks in smoking behavior among middle and older aged people living in rural areas of South Korea.MethodsThe study employed a cross-sectional design. Participants included 1,057 adults, with a mean age of 60.7 years, residing in rural areas. Information on participants' tobacco use, stress, social support, and social networks was collected using structured questionnaires. The chi-square test, the t-test, ANOVA, and logistic regression were used for data analysis.ResultsThe overall smoking prevalence in the study was 17.4% (men, 38.8%; women, 5.1%). Overall, stress was high among women, and social support was high among men. Smokers had high levels of social support (t = -2.90, p = .0038) and social networks (t = -2.22, p = .0271), as compared to non- and former smokers. Those in the high social support group were likely to be smokers (AOR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.15-4.26). Women with moderate social ties were less likely to smoke (AOR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.61).ConclusionThere was a protective role of a moderate social network level among women, and a high level of social support was associated with smoking behaviors in rural areas. Findings suggest the need for a comprehensive understanding of the functions and characteristics of social contextual factors including social support and social networks in order to conduct more effective anti-smoking interventions in rural areas.

Social engagement pattern, health behaviors and subjective well-being of older adults: an international perspective using WHO-SAGE survey data

“…In a US Study, Samuel et al also reported that emotional social support and neighborhood social cohesion were generally linked to lower smoking rates [7]. However, in the same paper, the authors pointed out that social support and social cohesion may be associated with higher smoking rate in groups with high rates of smoking, which is in line with previous research [25][26][27] and the current study. Past research has shown that the greater the social network size, the more likely a person is to smoke, especially in Asian cultures where collectivism is valued [28].…”

Social engagement and chronic disease risk behaviors: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

“…However, social support (Yun, Kang, Lim, Oh, & Son, 2010) and social cohesion (Chuang & Chuang, 2008; Li et al, 2012) may be associated with higher smoking rates in groups with high rates of smoking. Emotional social support (Weyers et al, 2010) and neighborhood social cohesion (Cleland et al, 2010; Cradock, Kawachi, Colditz, Gortmaker, & Buka, 2009; Pabayo, Belsky, Gauvin, & Curtis, 2010; Shelton et al, 2011; Utter, Denny, Robinson, Ameratunga, & Milfont, 2011; Echeverria, Diez-Roux, Shea, Borrell, & Jackson, 2008) are often associated with greater, and loneliness with less (Hawkley, Thisted, & Cacioppo, 2009; Shankar et al, 2011), physical activity, although associations are inconsistent for social support (Debnam, Holt, Clark, Roth, & Southward, 2012; Poortinga, 2006b) loneliness (Lauder et al, 2006) and social cohesion (Ball et al, 2010; Veitch et al, 2012) in similar large, diverse samples.…”

Social network type and health-related behaviors: Evidence from an American national survey

“…Jeffery & Rick, 2002), at simple indices of social network indicators (e.g. Yun et al, 2010) or at isolated indicators of the social network (e.g. Voorhees & Young, 2003).…”