2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03296.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Structural Position in L2 Phonological Acquisition: Evidence from English Learners of Spanish as L2

Abstract: In this pilot study, the speech of 12 adult native speakers of English with intermediate to intermediate‐high proficiency in Spanish as a second language (L2) was analyzed to determine whether L2 learners rely on distributional information in the process of L2 speech learning and if so, if similar or dissimilar distributional patterns of sounds are more easily acquired. The parameter for (dis)similarity was set around the notion of structural position in combination with native language (L1) and L2 phonemic in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, for instance, less frequent consonants and PSs in English should be more focused on in teaching English in EFL contexts. To be more elaborative, the impact of L1 phonetic dissimilarity on L2 learner's acquisition of L2 phonetic segments (Aoyama, Flege, Guion, Akhame-Yamada, & Yamada, 2004), the effect of the frequency of L1 input on successful L2 pronunciation (Aliaga-García, 2007), the effect of phoneme and feature frequency on the order of acquisition of consonants (Yamaguchi, 2007) and the effect of overlapping distributional patterns in L1 and L2 on phoneme production (Vokic, 2008) support the pedagogical importance of the phonetic frequency.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, for instance, less frequent consonants and PSs in English should be more focused on in teaching English in EFL contexts. To be more elaborative, the impact of L1 phonetic dissimilarity on L2 learner's acquisition of L2 phonetic segments (Aoyama, Flege, Guion, Akhame-Yamada, & Yamada, 2004), the effect of the frequency of L1 input on successful L2 pronunciation (Aliaga-García, 2007), the effect of phoneme and feature frequency on the order of acquisition of consonants (Yamaguchi, 2007) and the effect of overlapping distributional patterns in L1 and L2 on phoneme production (Vokic, 2008) support the pedagogical importance of the phonetic frequency.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has found however that L1's phonotactic properties in general, and the syllabic structure more specifically, do carry over in the acquisition of another language (for instance see Onishi et al 2002, Trammel 1993, Sato 1984, Delattre 1965. In a study that involved English learners of Spanish, Vokic (2008) found that distributional differences between the L2 and L1 phonemes contributed to explaining how successful learners were in producing phonemes in the target language. In a production task, learners were more successful when the distributional properties of the L2 phonemes overlapped those of the L1's phonemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are no L1 studies to our knowledge that specifically examine word position and spirantization, it has been shown, for example, that English-speaking children acquire fricatives first in word-medial position (Edwards, 1979). As Vokic (2008) notes, structural position may also correlate with ease of acquisition in L2 learning. For example, Major (1986) indicates that perception of rhotics can vary according to structural position, and reports that the few learners in his study that produced a native-like trill, did so only in word-medial position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%