2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00243-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
89
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Right now, our society is based on creativity and innovation, human creativity and tacit knowledge can be regarded as the main source of continuous innovation (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995;Koskinen and Vanharanta, 2002). Behavioral innovation can be influenced by things such as transformational leadership, organizational learning capabilities, and knowledge sharing (Pieterse et al, 2010;Monica Hu et al, 2009;Wang and Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right now, our society is based on creativity and innovation, human creativity and tacit knowledge can be regarded as the main source of continuous innovation (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995;Koskinen and Vanharanta, 2002). Behavioral innovation can be influenced by things such as transformational leadership, organizational learning capabilities, and knowledge sharing (Pieterse et al, 2010;Monica Hu et al, 2009;Wang and Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tacit knowledge is, thus, difficult to measure and express, but is described as a critical asset for individual, group and organizational performance (Styhre, 2004). Tacit knowledge is difficult to express and it can only be acquired and transferred by means of internalization and socialization (Koskinen & Vanharanta, 2002). While internalization usually happens in learning process, during which participants learn from each other by mutual support, advice and questioning, socialization usually happens in informal face-to-face interactions, which can take place through many channels (Daft & Weick, 1984).…”
Section: Definition and Characteristics Of Tacit Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining these two results indicates to the conclusion that the more flexible and integrated structures of small technology companies are, in terms of tacit knowledge utilization, more favorable to creativity than the larger enterprises which are often strictly divisionalised and depend on motivation through fixed rewards and punishments. According to Koskinen and Vanharanta (2002) small enterprises sustain their advantages of better interaction and motivation, factors, which are well known enablers of tacit knowledge utilization. Furthermore, research establishes that employees working for small companies experience more satisfaction at work than employees working for a larger one (Edlund & Nilsson, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%