Communicating Risks to the Public 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the media in risk communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of the mass media in risk communication, within health and more generally, has been debated for many years (Griffin & Dunwoody, 1998;Harrabin & Coote, 2003;Hill, 2001;Lichtenberg & MacLean, 1991). Recently, this debate has included work related to SARS.…”
Section: Sars and The Mass Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the mass media in risk communication, within health and more generally, has been debated for many years (Griffin & Dunwoody, 1998;Harrabin & Coote, 2003;Hill, 2001;Lichtenberg & MacLean, 1991). Recently, this debate has included work related to SARS.…”
Section: Sars and The Mass Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4,14) However, the level of media coverage given to a risk and the intensity of public concern for the issue are not always proportional to the severity of the risk problem in reality. (30,31) Eldridge and Reilly (13) found discrepancies between the level of media coverage measured by the number of newspaper articles and the actual number of infection cases of BSE in Britain from 1986 to 1996. Media concern over the issue stayed relatively low in 1992 and 1993, when the actual infection reached the highest level.…”
Section: Media and Risk Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Study that is oriented on the organizational aspects of risk (Perrow 1984;Clarke 1989) -Study of the context of the sociology of disaster (Dynes et al 1987) -Analysis of mass media and risk communication (Mazur 1981;Lichtenberg and MacLean 1991;Peltu 1988;Stallings 1990;Peters et al 1997;Lombardi 2005) -Risk conflicts and their causes (O'Riodan et al 1997;von Winterfeldt and Edwards 1984;Edwars and von Winterfeldt 1986;Dietz et al 1989) -Analysis of equity and lack of correctness (Kasperson and Kasperson 1983;MacLean 1986;Rosa 1998) -Analysis of risk distribution among classes and populations (Schnaiberg 1980;Beck 1986) -Study regarding epistemology and legitimization of knowledge of risk (Rip 1985;Jasanoff 1986;Dietz and Rycroft 1987;Evers and Nowotny 1987) In this specific work, the concept of risk is considered in the field of the sociology of disaster according to different traditions of thinking and, considering the importance of such studies for the risk perception and the social dynamics, which are the basis for adequate and effective prevention and planning activities, to potential risk for the population living in a specific social space (Krimsky and Golding 1992).…”
Section: Or Environment Damage) Resulting From the Interaction Betweementioning
confidence: 99%