2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the quality of shared information in interorganizational systems use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
2
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
89
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The fit indices recommended in the literature for validating the measurement model show how much the model fits the data (Hartono et al, 2010). These second-order indices of the model (IT Capabilities) are within the recommended limits (χ 2 /Gl = 1.654; CFI = 0.946; TLI = 0.937; IFI = 0.946; PCFI = 0.819; RMSEA = 0.066).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The fit indices recommended in the literature for validating the measurement model show how much the model fits the data (Hartono et al, 2010). These second-order indices of the model (IT Capabilities) are within the recommended limits (χ 2 /Gl = 1.654; CFI = 0.946; TLI = 0.937; IFI = 0.946; PCFI = 0.819; RMSEA = 0.066).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Multiple performance measures are adopted so as to detect IT business value, business process performance , innovation (Huang, 2011), inter-firm relation performance (Hartono et al, 2010), and firm perfomance (Nevo & Wade, 2011).…”
Section: The Impacts Of It Capabilities On Performance: Hypotheses Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IT infrastructure for KM is defined as the firm's basic IT platform and features, which comprise the diverse IT applications that are needed for implementing effective KM (Gold et al, 2001;Chua, 2004). Many prior studies have empirically investigated and suggested the appropriate design types of IT infrastructure, which have a positive impact on the various activities of KM, such as knowledge acquisition, storage and transfer (e.g., Artail, 2006;Lopez-Nicolas and Soto-Acosta, 2010;Hartono et al, 2010). However, their research have not empirically confirmed and proposed broad guidelines that can be wholly adopted in the design and construction of IT infrastructure for KM.…”
Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%