1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00658.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Reinforcer as a Stimulus

Abstract: The reinforcing event is present aa a stimulus in the situation in which a response is acquired and is absent from the extinction situation. When extinction conditions are made more similar to those of acquisition by introducing the reinforcer unrelated to behaviour ('free' reinforcement), the extinguished response is restored. Experiments with students, pigeons, and rats are described; and an analysis of the stimulus effects of reinforcement is used to account for 'dieinhibition', ' spontaneous recovery', and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
104
1
5

Year Published

1968
1968
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
14
104
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of free feeding on recovery of responding in pigeons has previously been described by Reid (1958). Figure 1 shows this effect in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The effect of free feeding on recovery of responding in pigeons has previously been described by Reid (1958). Figure 1 shows this effect in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Consistent with this prediction, it has long been known that noncontingently delivered outcomes can reinstate the performance of extinguished instrumental responding (e.g., Franks & Lattal, 1976;Reid, 1958;Rescorla & Skucy, 1969). Much remains unknown, however, about the specific function of the delivered outcome in instrumental reinstatement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, if the associative process underlying the influence of outcome value over performance is also responsible for the reinstatement effect, then the outcome's capacity to reinstate performance should depend on its current value. Alternatively, the S o -R account assumes that the outcome mediating reinstatement acts essentially as a discriminative stimulus (e.g., Capaldi, 1967;Franks & Lattal, 1976;Reid, 1958;Rescorla & Skucy, 1969). According to this view, it is the sensory properties of the outcome, and not its incentive properties, that become associated with the instrumental response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stimuiltus may ser-ve botlh r-einforcing and discrimninative functions simultaneouisly, but one ftunction might mask the otlher. For examnple, Reid (1958) and Cruse, Vittulli, and Dei-tke (1966) demonstr-ated that food can have discriminative effects as well as reinforcing effects. Also, Kelleher and Gollub (1962) an(d Man-i-(1969) dliscuisse(d the possibility that the conditioned-r-einforcing effects of chained-sclhedule stimuitili often are masked by the dlisci-iminative effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%