2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.16.342832
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the rodent lateral orbitofrontal cortex in simple Pavlovian cue-outcome learning depends on training experience

Abstract: The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a critical structure in the flexible control of value-based behaviours. OFC dysfunction is typically only detected when task or environmental contingencies change, against a backdrop of apparently intact initial acquisition and behaviour. While intact acquisition following OFC lesions in simple Pavlovian cue-outcome conditioning is often predicted by models of OFC function, this predicted null effect has not been thoroughly investigated. Here we test the effects of lesions and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite inactivation, rats in both groups progressively increased responding to the food cup during presentation of either cue (Figure 1D). Initial acquisition rates were similar, although rats in the hM4d group responded slightly less during the last two sessions of conditioning, in agreement with recent work showing that transient OFC inactivation can reduce asymptotic conditioned responding in some settings 24 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite inactivation, rats in both groups progressively increased responding to the food cup during presentation of either cue (Figure 1D). Initial acquisition rates were similar, although rats in the hM4d group responded slightly less during the last two sessions of conditioning, in agreement with recent work showing that transient OFC inactivation can reduce asymptotic conditioned responding in some settings 24 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Given that pretraining OFC lesions enhanced acquisition behavior, we expected that posttraining OFC dysfunction would also enhance acquisition. Surprisingly, posttraining OFC inactivation (Figure 2a) and lesions (Panayi & Killcross, 2020) significantly impaired acquisition. Specifically, whereas control animals continued to acquire responding, responding did not change when OFC was inactivated (Sessions 12–15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This might suggest that OFC inactivation may have disrupted the behavioral expression but not underlying learning during acquisition in this task. The opposing effects of pre- and posttraining OFC dysfunction might simply reflect differences in the compensatory function of other neural regions (in-depth discussion of alternative explanations are considered in Panayi & Killcross, 2020). The computational results presented hereafter suggest that this can also be interpreted in terms of a transiently disrupted arbitration mechanism while learning in the MB system was spared…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The OFC is required for aspects of what is learned even in simple conditioning. 13,14 By inactivating OFC in a temporally specific manner only during pre-exposure, our chemogenetic approach provides a much more definitive test of the specific hypothesis that the OFC is required when it is necessary to infer that the PE cue predicts the absence of reward and should thus be ignored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%