2020
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2019.0539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the ThyroSeq v3 Molecular Test in the Surgical Management of Thyroid Nodules in the Canadian Public Health Care Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to the results published by Ohori and colleagues, who reported a BCR of 81% and 56% for Bethesda III and IV nodules, respectively 6 . Similar findings have been reported by Chen et al (BCR for Bethesda III vs Bethesda IV nodules, 71% vs 48%, respectively) 7 . This finding was expected given the higher likelihood of malignancy for nodules with Bethesda IV cytology (range, 10%‐40%) than for those with Bethesda III cytology (range, 6%‐18%), 8 and it confirms that Bethesda III cytology with a negative ThyroSeq v3 result will help to reduce health care costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is similar to the results published by Ohori and colleagues, who reported a BCR of 81% and 56% for Bethesda III and IV nodules, respectively 6 . Similar findings have been reported by Chen et al (BCR for Bethesda III vs Bethesda IV nodules, 71% vs 48%, respectively) 7 . This finding was expected given the higher likelihood of malignancy for nodules with Bethesda IV cytology (range, 10%‐40%) than for those with Bethesda III cytology (range, 6%‐18%), 8 and it confirms that Bethesda III cytology with a negative ThyroSeq v3 result will help to reduce health care costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding was expected given the higher likelihood of malignancy for nodules with Bethesda IV cytology (range, 10%‐40%) than for those with Bethesda III cytology (range, 6%‐18%), 8 and it confirms that Bethesda III cytology with a negative ThyroSeq v3 result will help to reduce health care costs. A limitation of this study and other similar studies 6,7 that have reported the performance of such molecular tests is the lack of long‐term follow‐up for nodules with a benign molecular signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Both these papers, as well as comparative study by Harrell and colleagues, suggested that the rate of surgical intervention was lower during the period when the newer test was utilized ( 39 ). However, discrepancies between these initial reports and experience from real world usage are already appearing; Chen and colleagues, for instance, found that the benign call rate of GEC was only 58% compared to the 74% reported in an earlier publication ( 40 , 41 ). Ultimately, as was learned in the case of Afirma-GEC and ThyroSeq V2, these initial findings and test performances need to be confirmed in both independent validation studies and in larger cohorts.…”
Section: Diagnostic Utilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1 Although there is consensus that overdiagnosis is the main reason for increased incidence 2,3 mainly due to incidental thyroid nodules found on imaging screenings performed for reasons other than thyroid disease evaluation, 4 there has also been a true increase in the occurrence of thyroid cancer. 5 Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the current gold standard for triaging patients with suspicious thyroid nodules detected clinically or on ultrasound (US), [6][7][8]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the current gold standard for triaging patients with suspicious thyroid nodules detected clinically or on ultrasound (US), 6-8 and the six-tier Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology attempts to standardize cytopathologic analysis. 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%